On February 25, the Ninth Circuit ruled 2-1 that Arizona can’t require voters who use the federal Voter Registration form to attach copies of a birth certificate or a certificate of naturalization. Mi Familia Vota v Fontes, 24-3188.
Arizona acknowledged that voters who use the federal form don’t need such documents to vote for Congress, but said they can’t vote for President without such documents. Arizona argued that the U.S. Constitution lets Congress pass election laws that govern congressional elections, as Congress had done when it passed the National Voter Registration Act, setting up federal voter registration forms. But Arizona insisted that the U.S. Constitution doesn’t let Congress pass laws regulating presidential elections.
Arizona’s attitude is a sharp departure from almost 100 years of precedent from the U.S. Supreme Court that Congress can regulate presidential elections. As long ago as 1934, Congress upheld federal campaign finance laws affecting presidential elections. In 1970 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Oregon v Mitchell that Congress even had the authority to set the voting age at 18 for presidential and congressional elections.
The decision is by Judge Ronald Gould, a Clinton appointee. It is also signed by Judge Kim McLane Wardlaw, another Clinton appointee. The opinion is 79 pages. The dissent, by Trump appointee Patrick Bumatay, is 77 pages. There are other issues in the case also, all relating to voter registration.
one more case for SCOTUS–
along with all the tyrant trump/ tyrant musk 2025 cases
Si senor. Mas votas por illegales, es mucho bueno.
https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/2025/02/25/holtec-hyundai-palisades-nuclear-energy-small-modular-reactor/79322073007/
small nuke reactors –
how many in Oval Office / musk office ???
https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/health-wellness/2025/02/25/elon-musk-donald-trump-disabled-people/80112602007/
how many banned words/phrases in Devil City ???
https://electionlawblog.org/?p=148734
ELB prof
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proclamation_by_the_Crown_Act_1539
Proclamation by the Crown Act 1539
—-
2025 tyrant trump via exec ords – trying to outdo 1539 brit tyrant king Hen 8 via procs ???
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/18th.asp
1700-1799 documents
all mean zero to tyrant trump and his gangsters
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/02/25/house-republicans-trump-agenda/80127282007/
217-215 trump budget in usa h reps
gerrymander monarchs/oligarchs at work
https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/02/supreme-court-grants-richard-glossip-new-trial-in-capital-case/
FALSE EVIDENCE – DEATH PENALTY CASE
—
HOW MANY DEAD KILLED BY GOVTS AFTER FALSE EVIDENCE CASES ???
Oregon v Mitchell 1970-
SCOTUS SUBVERSION OF 1-2-1 AND 17 AMDT PARA 1 —
STATE DEFINITION OF ELECTOR-VOTER IN USA ELECTIONS —
SUBJECT T0 14-2 / 15 / 19 / 24 / 26 AMDTS
https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2025/02/25/trump-says-he-will-offer-gold-cards-for-5-million-path-to-citizenship/80348946007/
NOOO USA L-A-W NEEDED IN TYRANT TRUMP MACHINATION ???
https://apnews.com/article/illegal-immigrant-registry-trump-border-enforcement-37ce7a345c1617ce3a9427e0ef755021
INVADERS TO REGISTER ???
HOW STUPID IS TYRANT TRUMP ???
LIKE TRYING TO GET ALL CRIMINALS IN THE USA TO REGISTER THEIR CRIMES —- PAST / PRESENT / FUTURE
The Supreme Court needs to overturn this.
Indeed. They also need to mandate using Akismet.
“As long ago as 1934, Congress upheld federal campaign finance laws affecting presidential elections.”
What federal campaign finance laws were in effect in 1934?
I’m glad after suffering 4 years under Biden Harris we finally have a president who is not a tyrant.
WZ–
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burroughs_v._United_States
1934 -during 1929-1941 Great Depression I
Bill, Akismet Zealot, and Victor all make great points.