U.S. Supreme Court Intervenes in Ohio Initiative Lawsuit

On April 10, Justice Brett Kavanaugh reimposed the stay in Brown v Yost, 24A970. This is the case over whether the Ohio procedures for initiatives violate the U.S. Constitution. On April 9 the Sixth Circuit had ruled tentatively on favor of initiative proponents. Ohio then appealed to Justice Kavanaugh, who that same day suspended what the Sixth Circuit had done, for at least a short time. The initiative proponents will respond to the U.S. Supreme Court by April 16.

The issue is whether the Attorney General can prevent an initiative petition from starting to collect signatures, by refusing to approve the description of the initiative that would appear on the petition. The Attorney General had rejected eight versions of the language, which made it impossible for the proponents to have enough time to collect the needed signatures.

The U.S. District Court had ruled against the state but had stayed its own opinion. Then the Sixth Circuit had ended the stay, but it is now back in force.


Comments

U.S. Supreme Court Intervenes in Ohio Initiative Lawsuit — 2 Comments

  1. https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2025/04/10/house-passes-bill-to-limit-nationwide-orders-from-federal-district-judges/83020709007/

    House passes bill to limit nationwide orders from federal district judges
    Kevin Freking
    Associated Press
    Washington – The House passed legislation Wednesday mostly along party lines that limits the authority of federal district judges to issue nationwide orders, as Republicans react to several court rulings against the Trump administration.
    —-
    how many election cases will be affected ???

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.