On April 7, President Donald Trump filed this brief in the U.S. Supreme Court in State of New Jersey v Trump, 24A886.
Comments
Donald Trump Files Brief in U.S. Supreme Court in One of the Birthright Citizenship Cases — 16 Comments
Trump is 100% correct.
You probably didn’t read the brief. It is mostly about whether it was proper for the US District Court to issue a nationwide injunction, instead of just an injunction affecting the plaintiff state and its own residents.
“No person except a natural born citizen…shall be eligible to the office of President;”. But if the government determines that there is no such thing as birthright citizenship, then no one is eligible to hold the office of President.
The House passed a requirement to prove U.S. citizenship to vote. This is how it could affect voting
Christina A. Cassidy
Associated Press
Atlanta — The U.S. House on Thursday approved legislation requiring documentary proof of U.S. citizenship for anyone registering to vote, something voting rights group have warned could disenfranchise millions of Americans.
The requirement has been a top election-related priority for President Donald Trump and House Republicans, who argue it’s needed to eliminate instances of noncitizen voting, which is already rare and, as numerous state cases have shown, is typically a mistake rather than part of a coordinated attempt to subvert an election.
It’s already illegal under federal law for people who are not U.S. citizens to cast ballots and can lead to felony charges and deportation.
The bill, known as the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, or the SAVE Act, now heads to the Senate, where its fate is uncertain because Republicans don’t have a large enough majority to avoid a filibuster.
USA NBC-
NEW KID IS USA NBC IF FATHER IS A USA NBC OR NATURALIZED CITIZEN. — NATION-STATE ***ALLEGIANCE*** CHAIN.
SEE LAST PARA OF 4 JULY 1776 DOI.
PLACE OF BIRTH MEANS Z-E-R-O — GOES BAAAACK TO OLDE ENGLAND AND ITS MANY WARS WITH FRANCE —
ENGLISH FATHER KIDS BORN IN FRANCE. ENGLISH LAW PASSED 1350 – MERE 675 YEARS AGO
1898 SCOTUS HACKS SCREWED UP IN WONG KIM ARK — TO BE OVER-RULED.
.
Why do you want the NBC network to decide who is a citizen?
ONE RESULT OF THE MINORITY RULE GERRYMANDERS IN ALL STATES —
Well I’m Donald Trump, the one they’re talking about, if you talk crap about me you’ll get punched in the mouth.
If you disrespect me, forget about it, forget it. Best case for you is you’ll survive to regret it.
Count me as pleasantly surprised by the well articulated arguments in the brief. The judiciary is the weakest of the 3 branches especially when Congress gives discretion to the Executive Branch to act. It makes sense that a district court can’t make a decision that affects a completely removed circuit but here we are.
Trump is 100% correct.
You probably didn’t read the brief. It is mostly about whether it was proper for the US District Court to issue a nationwide injunction, instead of just an injunction affecting the plaintiff state and its own residents.
“No person except a natural born citizen…shall be eligible to the office of President;”. But if the government determines that there is no such thing as birthright citizenship, then no one is eligible to hold the office of President.
https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2025/04/10/congress-elections-things-to-know-save-act/83028194007/
The House passed a requirement to prove U.S. citizenship to vote. This is how it could affect voting
Christina A. Cassidy
Associated Press
Atlanta — The U.S. House on Thursday approved legislation requiring documentary proof of U.S. citizenship for anyone registering to vote, something voting rights group have warned could disenfranchise millions of Americans.
The requirement has been a top election-related priority for President Donald Trump and House Republicans, who argue it’s needed to eliminate instances of noncitizen voting, which is already rare and, as numerous state cases have shown, is typically a mistake rather than part of a coordinated attempt to subvert an election.
It’s already illegal under federal law for people who are not U.S. citizens to cast ballots and can lead to felony charges and deportation.
The bill, known as the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, or the SAVE Act, now heads to the Senate, where its fate is uncertain because Republicans don’t have a large enough majority to avoid a filibuster.
USA NBC-
NEW KID IS USA NBC IF FATHER IS A USA NBC OR NATURALIZED CITIZEN. — NATION-STATE ***ALLEGIANCE*** CHAIN.
SEE LAST PARA OF 4 JULY 1776 DOI.
PLACE OF BIRTH MEANS Z-E-R-O — GOES BAAAACK TO OLDE ENGLAND AND ITS MANY WARS WITH FRANCE —
ENGLISH FATHER KIDS BORN IN FRANCE. ENGLISH LAW PASSED 1350 – MERE 675 YEARS AGO
1898 SCOTUS HACKS SCREWED UP IN WONG KIM ARK — TO BE OVER-RULED.
.
Why do you want the NBC network to decide who is a citizen?
ONE RESULT OF THE MINORITY RULE GERRYMANDERS IN ALL STATES —
https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/2025/04/07/michigan-tax-burden-wallethub-study/82971477007/
What is Michigan’s tax burden? Here’s how WalletHub ranked the states
The brief was filed by the Solicitor General of the United States.
NBC would make all illegals citizens because they are an evil communist network.
@ winger the district court national injunctions have gotten out of hand
@ Robinson there is such a thing as birthright citizenship which was never meant to include illegals
the usa AG and SG are both super hacks of tyrant trump
another super hack coming – head of DC usa attorney office
ALL like STALIN/HITLER INTERNAL TERRORISTS – S–T
https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/13/politics/kilmar-abrego-garcia-trump-administration-filing/index.html
WILL SCOTUS 5 END THE TYRANNY OF TYRANT TRUMP ???
SEE BRIT KING CHARLES I REGIME 1625-1649 – ESP EARLY HABEAS CORPUS STUFF
https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/14/europe/ukraine-sumy-trump-russia-intl/index.html
twin tyrants from Hell – Trump and Putin
add red china XI = trio of death and destruction
Well I’m Donald Trump, the one they’re talking about, if you talk crap about me you’ll get punched in the mouth.
If you disrespect me, forget about it, forget it. Best case for you is you’ll survive to regret it.
Count me as pleasantly surprised by the well articulated arguments in the brief. The judiciary is the weakest of the 3 branches especially when Congress gives discretion to the Executive Branch to act. It makes sense that a district court can’t make a decision that affects a completely removed circuit but here we are.
Judge shopping. More of the demon rat Lawfare