Sixth Circuit Upholds Tennessee Ballot Access Law for New Political Parties

On May 1, the Sixth Circuit issued a nine-page opinion, upholding the Tennessee law that requires 43,498 signatures for a new or previously unqualified party to get on the Tennessee ballot. Darnell v Hargett, 24-5856.

The opinion is by Judge Chad Readler, a Trump appointee. It is also signed by Judge Amul Thapar, another Trump appointee; and Eric Clay, a Clinton appointee. It will not be published.

It merely says that the law has been upheld before. It does not mention that since then, the Sixth Circuit struck down Michigan’s 30,000-signature requirement for independent statewide candidates. Nor does it mention that the Tennessee law has existed since 1972 and has never been used. It doesn’t mention any U.S. Supreme Court ballot access opinion.


Comments

Sixth Circuit Upholds Tennessee Ballot Access Law for New Political Parties — 18 Comments

  1. One thing many in both ruling parties agree on: insulating themselves from political competition, free and fair elections be darned.

  2. Andy, it’s too soon to say. Part of any decision will depend on what the US Supreme Court does with the New York case Meadors v Erie Co. Bd. of Elections.

  3. Perhaps BAN can at least list ALL SCOTUS ballot access opinions [ WITH MINI-SUMMARIES] in ***USEFUL INFORMATION*** LINK AT THE TOP OF BAN. ???

  4. TYRANT TRUMP —

    2028 candidate of commie united nationalist tyrants [CUNT] Party ???

  5. May Day greetings to all communist workers! Trump is destroying capitalism like never before! The world wide workers revolution is at hand!

  6. Well I’m Donald Trump, the one they’re talking about, if you talk crap about me you’ll get punched in the mouth.

  7. If you disrespect me, forget about it, forget it. Best case for you is you’ll survive to regret it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.