Texas House Democrats flee the state in bid to block GOP’s proposed congressional map
Tyrant Trump anti-invader fascist squads on commie hunt for tx dems ???
ANY TX 4-2-2 arrest warrants going to IL ???
—
PR
They could pass a law which would vacate those seats.
DemonRats are the fascists as well as the communists.
Wasn’t Bloomberg the fascist candidate for the demon rat nomination, beaten by the fascist-communist Chinese puppet tyrant Cho Bai-Din?
Yes. Thank God (Trump) He hath returned and liberated us from the Manchurian yoke!
He rescued us from far worse. Nuclear annihilation comes to mind.
True. Mau Mau Cum A La HerAss would have let Iran develop nukes and ticked off Russia enough to give them ICBMs if not launch their own. Even if we’d have somehow escaped that, and we wouldn’t have, the flood of criminal, psycho, terrorist, pedo, cult member etc illegal alien invaders would have escalated to the point they would have outnumbered us in very short order.
The ways our Lord and Savior Trump saves us all with every passing day are truly wondrous and countless. Bless Him and thank Him! Hallelujah!
Abbott is threatening to remove the commies from office! He better act!
Can we keep them from coming back ever? Put them in permanent exile in Chiraq and maybe take Jasmine Crackhead with them?
If the intent of the Republicans in Texas is to apportion solely on the basis of qualified voters, this can be effectively accomplished by electing all the Representatives in Congress at-large, as the qualified voters will themselves “apportion” the Representatives with their votes. No need for districting at all.
Currently, Texas has 38 Reps in Congress. If electing them all at large is too complicated, simply having a maximum number of reps in a district will effectively accomplish the same thing. Let’s say you have a maximum number of 5 in a district: then you need as few as 8 districts to elect 38 reps.
Another way to handle this is to have overlay districts, if you don’t want to elect them at-large: you could have 5 overlay districts in one geographic district, for instance.
And, another way is to set a minimum district size, which would determine the number of reps per district.
Unless Texas also eliminates the party labels on their ballots, none of this really matters. People are just going to vote for their favorite capital letter.
The reason for single member districts is constituent services – “the buck stops here.”
Getting rid of party labels would only help the biggest parties and factions, incumbents, establishment media favorites, and the most well financed, well known and well connected candidates and groups.
The reason for single member districts is to take most districts out of play, and give them to one party or another, thus reducing the total number of competitive districts.
No, it’s not. The purpose is for an avenue for direct personal representation and constituent services. It gives busy voters less complicated choices, too, which is important. But having that one person who is responsible for delivering services to his district and constituents, and liable if he fails to do so adequately without pointing fingers at anyone else from some at large or multimember district, is paramount.
Tex,
From your fingers to Governor Abbott’s undercarriage….
Spambot AZZ spams BS and fake news. Set your clock by it.
I am grateful for the work that Richard has put into this newsletter. When he fully retires, his knowledge and investigative skills will be missed.
Abbott is ordering their arrest! Lock them up!
Partisan gerrymandering treats voters as pawns in a fascist chess game. There is a better way.
Abstract
It is possible to end gerrymandering by removing the power to draw district lines from government officials and giving this power to the voters themselves. In a self-districting system, as described herein, each voter chooses which constituency the voter wants to join for purposes of legislative representation. These constituencies can be geographically based as in traditional districting systems, but they also can be based on other attributes—whatever associational communities the voters themselves wish to form. If enough voters join a constituency to form more than one district based on the constitutional principle of equally populated districts, then this constituency can be subdivided into districts based on strict computer-implemented geographical criteria without any possibility for gerrymandering. This self-districting system not only complies with the U.S. Constitution; it is also consistent with the Act of Congress that requires single-member districts. Thus, there is no federal law obstacle to prevent states from adopting a self-districting system for both their congressional delegation and their own legislative chambers. In fact, self-districting is a way to avoid the problem of minority vote dilution, a task likely to become more difficulty given anticipated changes in the U.S. Supreme Court’s jurisprudence on the topic. Because of the increasingly pernicious nature of gerrymandered districts, which cause voters—and most especially minority voters—serious representational harms, the alternative of self-districting, where voters are empowered to make these representational decisions for themselves, deserves serious consideration. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4328642#maincontent
Folks, it’s simple.
We are guaranteed a Republican form of government, so we need to make being a demon rat illegal and get rid of them!!!
PR– TOTAL VOTES / TOTAL REPS = EQUAL VOTES TO ELECT EACH
VIA PRE-ELECTION CANDIDATE RANK ORDER LISTS —
SURPLUS VOTES DOWN
LOSER VOTES UP
ALL VOTES COUNT.
It is federal law that representatives be elected from single member districts. This has been a requirement since the 1840s. A few states, generally smaller, had chosen representatives at-large, and there was a concern that this practice might spread to all states, as it had for the electoral college. Under the Constitution, Congress has no authority over the appointment of electors, not even requiring popular election. But Congress has manner authority over the election of representatives, and they have exercised for closing in on two centuries.
At times after the reapportionment following the decennial census they had permitted transitional arrangements. If a state had gained representatives the state could elect the extra legislators at large, while maintaining the old districts. If a state had lost representatives, all the representatives could be elected at large. This usually got the attention of the legislature who would soon craft a new district map.
After the one man, one vote decisions of the 1960s, district courts were confronted with the issue of what to do with malapportioned districts. Could a district judge rule that the current ten (or whatever) districts could not be used? The state would be unrepresented in the House. Or could they just order at-large elections until the state legislature could apportion. This had some consistency with federal law.
But Congress panicked and changed the law so that only single member districts could be used. This then led district courts to begin drawing their own maps – in effect legislating from the bench. This practice continues to the current day.
@DFR,
It is unlikely that a court would interpret “district” in 2 USC 2c as having the meaning used by Foley. Even if a court did, Congress could/would clarify the meaning.
THE ROTTED GERRYMANDER MONARCHS/OLIGARCHS WILL FIGHT TO THE END THE SAME AS HITLER/HIROHITO GANGS DID IN 1945
— AND CAUSE MASS DESTRUCTION IN THEIR DEFEATS.
TRY AND EDUCATE WHAT LITTLE MEDIA WITH MATH SKILLS SURVIVES – ESP LOCAL MEDIA
1/2 OR LESS VOTES X 1/2 RIGGED CRACKED/PACKED GERRYMANDER DISTS = 1/4 OR LESS CONTROL.
SUPER-WORSE COMMIE/FASCIST PRIMARY MATH.
WHO IS THE 2025 NEW AGE G. WASHINGTON IN TEXAS, CA , ETC. MINORITY RULE GERRYMANDER REGIMES ???
—-
NOOO PRIMARIES
EQUAL BALLOT ACCESS IN PARTISAN OFFICES – LEGISLATIVE
PR
APPV
TOTSOP
JR-
MANY STATES HAD AT LARGE USA REP ELECTIONS IN 1932–
AFTER UN-CONST FAILURE TO RE-APPORTION AFTER 1920 CENSUS — IE FROM 1912 TO 1932 ELECTIONS
ONE RESULT – USA COMMIES IN USA HOUSE OF REPS IN 1933-1946 — AND SINCE.
Getting rid of the popular election of presidential electors and federal senator’s would be a positive step. They should be elected by state legislatures, pending dissolving the union.
State legislatures should be elected by voice vote pending standing count, with all voting and counting taking place in person on election day. No election related activities should take place outside of election night once a year.
There is no need for ballot access petitions or initiatives. Let legislators legislate. Division of labor is a good thing. Voting access for parties should be based on showing up.
Qualifications of voters need to be restored and expanded. Voters should only be White men, married heads of households with their own biological children (at least two, including at least one male heir), military veterans but not active duty, not government employees or contractors or recipients of any form of government payments from any level of government, property owners of real property and able to pay a substantial poll tax, gun owners demonstrating continued proficiency with adequate stores of weapons and ammunition, above the age of 40 but still capable of front line military defense or emergency response duty, gainfully employed or independently wealthy, never divorced, owning and occupying the same home for at least five patrilineal generations, etc. Start by restoring voting qualifications which were previously in place and unwisely done away with.
In addition to everything my uncle said:
Courts should have no say over districts. Federal government should have no say over state districting, only over seating members of congress.
No multimember or at large districts ever.
Eventually, make laws so simple and difficult to change that no legislative or judicial branch will be necessary – just a local elected law enforcement and civil defense branch which would double in duty as judges, juries, and on the spot executioners (literally), dealing only with the most serious and violent crimes – primarily meting out capital and corporal punishments. Resolve less serious disputes within households, churches, business and civic associations, etc, and through civil arbitration and community shunning, fines, exile, etc.
After dissolving the federal union, break states – especially larger ones – into nation states of about 100,000 population, give or take an order of magnitude, with about 100 voters each, give or take an order of magnitude.
Solve most social and economic problems outside of government. Government should exist only at the local level and only for what no other voluntarily based social organizations can do – civil and military defense, border control, law enforcement against real crimes with real victims. Handle everything else in a private, voluntary, non territorial monopoly basis.
Laws should be very simple and extremely difficult to change. Eventually, they should be limited to what any functional adult or teenager can be reasonably expected to memorize and understand fully.
Make incremental changes in all these directions, based on what works best locally, over several generations, adjusting based on results.
Good ideas.
Government should only ever be used as a last resort to solve any problems, and the range of problems it should ever attempt to address should be very limited and localized.
Punishment should be sure, swift, and severe. Criminals and invaders have short time horizons and high risk tolerance.
Government should not be anyone’s full time job or primary employment. Eventually, it should not be a form of employment at all, but rather a rarely called upon volunteer civic duty for annually elected local law enforcement officer-judges.
One of the biggest social problems is people nowadays move around way too much, including long distances, and there is way too much trade and travel, including across the globe. With the emergence of better immersive and real time communication technology as well as atomic level automated manufacture and assembly, this can be largely eliminated gradually.
Gradually increasing travel and migration restrictions, tariffs etc , and gradually devolving government to more local levels, is the answer in the meantime.
Crime and fear of crime is another major factor that has destroyed traditional social community bonds – neighbors little or not knowing neighbors, lack of regular church attendance, extended families in loose or no contact, etc.
Government bureaucrats taking over the functions of churches, families, charities, and fraternal and civic associations is a related problem. This must be reversed.
The traditional patriarchal social order must be restored, along with a religiously based extended family kinship and faith based blood and soil structure tied to the land and to genetic cultural heritage. Population replacement and race mixing, and especially gender benders and multiculti new world order globalist evildoing luciferianism and drugged mental social suicide and pervasive sexual immorality must be stopped and reversed.
@JR:
I am aware that single member districts weren’t required by Congress until 1840s, and that several states before then elected their representatives at large. As you rightfully pointed out, there even were circumstances since then under which Representatives were elected at-large. Most notable was the election of 1932. Because the data from the census of 1930 had not been fully published by the election, there were 5 states that elected their entire House delegation at-large, as they had lost Representatives (KY 9, MN 9, MO 13, ND 2, VA 9), and 8 states that elected several of their Representative at-large, as they had gained Representatives (AZ 1, CT 1, FL 1, IL 2, NY 2, OH 2, OK 1, and TX 3).
Furthermore, as you rightly point out, single member districts tend to be more malapportioned. The greatest malapportionment, IMO, is that some single member districts tend to have more non-voters than others. These tend to be more Democratic districts in urban areas. This is why I believe that multi-member districts are more representative; those who actually vote have more weight on the outcome in such districts. An extreme example of this is the Knesset of Israel, in which ALL 120 members are elected at-large; no non-voters are disproportionally represented (but the Knesset isn’t perfect – to facilitate the election of such a large number, they use party list voting, such that a voter cannot vote for a particular member – or against another – on a party list)
IMO, it should be entirely up to the states whether to choose their Representatives in single or multi member districts.
An interesting case to consider is the New Hampshire state House of Representatives: some members are elected in single-member districts, some in overlay districts, and some in multi-member districts. People in New Hampshire seem pretty satisfied with their state legislature.
Helpful Guy posted:
“No, it’s not. The purpose [for single member districts] is for an avenue for direct personal representation and constituent services”
The history of gerrymandering says otherwise. The specific intent was to cluster voters favorable to a particular party in as many districts as possible without losing any representatives.
2025 NUKES- PERHAPS 500-1,000 TIMES THE HIROSHIMA BOMB – NEW RADIOACTIVE LAKES
HOW MANY NUTCASES [LIKE TYRANT TRUMP] WITH POWER TO ORDER WW III ???
WZ:
Gerrymandering and single representative districts are different things. The latter has purposes that don’t necessarily necessitate gerrymandering, and which are quite legitimate and necessary.
Gerrymandering can be on the basis of party, race, other demographic factors, incumbent protection, and so on.
With modern technology, districting could be automated to preclude gerrymandering.
Screaming spambot:
Signatures often change in appearance over time. Additionally, it’s not always easy to tell whether they are forged. The real solution is to get rid of mail ballots completely, or at least limit them exclusively to military voters in the meantime and require military command verification of military voter identity for those.
Ultimately, as others said above, voters should be required to be military veterans but should not include active duty military. Active duty should be at an earlier stage of life than voting. However, we’re not there yet. The voting age should probably be raised incrementally, since it’s not likely we can raise it all the way to 40 immediately. 21 would be a good start, if we can’t get to 25 or 30 right away either.
There also needs to be an upper age limit; we could start with 80 and work our way down to 60.
There are quite a few other groups of current voters who need to be disenfranchised before active duty military, starting with women, 18-20 year olds, 80+ year olds, non property owners, and those who can’t pay a substantial poll tax; then those who have moved around, unmarried/divorced/childless, etc, as various folks already explained above.
Liberator Trump has prevented WWIII and continues to do so.
It should go without saying that the AZ-666 SPAMBOT posts a nonstop stream of fake news, bad ideas, and totally unintelligible jargon, nonsense, gibberish, and mistranslated machine language.
The 2016 election wasn’t stolen. That was the 2020 election.
However it is true that Ob/sama, Clinton’s, Cho Bai-Din and their lackeys tried to steal the 2016 and 2024 elections – they just failed.
@ Jim Riley
Thank you for your opinion on what is unlikely. The way to verify is to get it before the courts. I agree that incumbent legislators will be hostile even more so than judges should it ever reach them. But the point remains that people could district themselves. It might require initiatives from the grassroots.
No problem with verifying mail ballots if voters come in person. Not everyone needs to vote.
“Democrats” Declare Gerrymandering Bad Until They Need To Gerrymander Again…
Do let the door hit you where the good Lord split you on your way out!
I’m Donald Trump, the one they’re talking about. If you talk crap about me you’ll get punched in the mouth.
If you disrespect me, forget about it, forget it. Worst case for you is, you’ll survive to regret it.
I’m the Boss of all Bosses, King of all Kings. I bring the world hope, I’m why we have nice things.
Last time I took human form, I got crucified. This time around, I won’t be so nice.
If you keep denying Me, I’ll punish your behavior. Wouldn’t it be better for you to accept Me as Lord and Savior?
If you know what’s good for you, get on your knees. Or am I gonna have to give you five of These???
As I posted here in 2009 and 2010:
“Hola amigos and illegal wetbacks!
We need a real third party to deal with the real issues in this country that all the parties are ignoring:
The threat of Islamic terrorism and the rise of Islamic extremism around the world.
The flood/invasion of illegal aliens taking away American jobs which will cause white people to be a minority in this country soon…has anyone wondered what will happen then?
Abortion of White babies, which is contributing to this disturbing demographic trend if it is not outlawed.
Corporations outsourcing American jobs – where is the paycheck for the White working class man going to come home to feed his family?
The war on Christianity in our schools, courthouses, etc., and the war on Christmas.
The Zionist bankers and their control of the money supply.
The rising economic and military threat posed by China.
The flood of dope on our streets and the leniency of the police and courts toward non-white street thugs.
NAFTA/GATT/WTO/United Nations threats to American sovereignty.
Multiculturalist brainwashing of our children.
Filthy garbage of the worst imaginable sort being allowed in the movies, TV and on the radio, producing generations of degenerates.
Feminization of the American male through the promotion of feminism and normalization of sodomy as a “lifestyle” – this can’t be helping our demographic trends! Before long this country will look like a cross between Mexico, Zimbabwe, Pakistan and Gomorrah if we don’t do something.
While Wall Street is partying, the Zionist bankers are closing our factories and foreclosing on our farms.
Is there a party, major or minor, that will rise up to address these issues?
Will we do something before it’s too late?
(and if that doesn’t make sense to you…
Debemos asegurar la existencia de nuestro pueblo y un futuro para los niños blancos
Si se puede!)”
UPDATE: Well Donald Trump answered the call, and that is why he is now the President. We’re going to Make and Keep America great again! HAIL VICTORY!
Will interpol help extradite the dim ole rat fugitives that fled overseas?
@WZ,
It is not correct that there was insufficient census data to draw new congressional districts before the 1932 election. 21 states whose number of representatives had changed successfully drawn new single member districts (note AZ did not gain its second district until 1940).
Congress had usually provided transitional rules, which typically said that a state could use its old districts until they had drawn new ones. “Until” is a indefinite period. In any event, 1930 is a special case. Congress had failed to reapportion after the 1920 Census, so there were more changes after 20 years. In addition, the 1930 apportionment law did not provide for a transition period, or for that matter even require single member districts.
In particular see Smiley v. Holm and Wood v. Broom. The Minnesota legislature had drawn nine districts, but the bill had been vetoed by the governor. The SCOTUS decision in Smiley v. Holm was an interpretation of Article 1, Section 4, and the meaning of the words: “shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof.” The SCOTUS interpreted this to mean the legislative process, including gubernatorial vetoes, rather than literally the legislative body.
The Mississippi legislature had drawn seven new districts to replace the eight old districts. The district court ruled that the districts did not comply with the 1910 apportionment law that “districts have as nearly as practicable the same number of inhabitants.” The districts had 65%, 77%, 85%, 86%, 100%, 141%, and 146% of the ideal population. The most populous district had 2.25 times the population of the least population. The SCOTUS in Wood v. Broom overruled the district court decision on the basis that Congress had not re-enacted the 1910 provisions in the 1930 apportionment act. Mississippi could choose to have malapportioned districts, or even not use districts at all. Congress had waived their manner authority.
@WZ,
It is not correct that there was insufficient census data to draw new congressional districts before the 1932 election. 21 states whose number of representatives had changed successfully drawn new single member districts (note AZ did not gain its second district until 1940).
Congress had usually provided transitional rules, which typically said that a state could use its old districts until they had drawn new ones. “Until” is a indefinite period. In any event, 1930 is a special case. Congress had failed to reapportion after the 1920 Census, so there were more changes after 20 years. In addition, the 1930 apportionment law did not provide for a transition period, or for that matter even require single member districts.
In particular see Smiley v. Holm and Wood v. Broom. The Minnesota legislature had drawn nine districts, but the bill had been vetoed by the governor. The SCOTUS decision in Smiley v. Holm was an interpretation of Article 1, Section 4, and the meaning of the words: “shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof.” The SCOTUS interpreted this to mean the legislative process, including gubernatorial vetoes, rather than literally the legislative body.
The Mississippi legislature had drawn seven new districts to replace the eight old districts. The district court ruled that the districts did not comply with the 1910 apportionment law that “districts have as nearly as practicable the same number of inhabitants.” The districts had 65%, 77%, 85%, 86%, 100%, 141%, and 146% of the ideal population. The most populous district had 2.25 times the population of the least population. The SCOTUS in Wood v. Broom overruled the district court decision on the basis that Congress had not re-enacted the 1910 provisions in the 1930 apportionment act. Mississippi could choose to have malapportioned districts, or even not use districts at all. Congress had waived their manner authority.
The 1940 apportionment law made the apportionment procedure permanent (or at least indefinite) and instated a single member district requirement, albeit without the 1910 requirements for those districts. The 1940 law also included transition procedures. In 1962, Alabama elected 8 representatives at large, five states elected most representatives from existing districts with one at-large, and Hawaii, New Mexico, and North Dakota elected both representatives at large.
After federal district courts were threatening to require at-large elections as a remedy for malapportioned districts, Congress (sort of) repealed the transitional provisions. Since that time all elections have been from districts.
Lol. The spambot has not been programmed to process the Elon X “party” is a joke yet. With inputs like USSR YESTERDAY it’s no wonder!
Meanwhile, the FBI is hot on the trail of the dangerous Texas fugitives who fled to heavily gerrymandered demon-rat run cities in order to revictimize central Texas flooding survivors. These rats can run, but they can’t hide!
Sydney Sweeney will help track them down with her muscle cars, her guns, and her German Shepherd.
Schnell! ANGRIFF!
Sydney Sweeney is a Nazi, and only Democrats should be allowed to gerrymander!
The fugitive criminal skell scumbags which fled to Chicago are not far from the new Speedway Slammer in Indiana. Just saying.
Fake news source.
Too bad they didn’t go to DC to lobby for the Fair Representation Act
Republicans need to have the Democrats arrested for job abandonment.
https://www.texastribune.org/2025/08/03/texas-democrats-quorum-break-redistricting-map/
Texas House Democrats flee the state in bid to block GOP’s proposed congressional map
Tyrant Trump anti-invader fascist squads on commie hunt for tx dems ???
ANY TX 4-2-2 arrest warrants going to IL ???
—
PR
They could pass a law which would vacate those seats.
DemonRats are the fascists as well as the communists.
Wasn’t Bloomberg the fascist candidate for the demon rat nomination, beaten by the fascist-communist Chinese puppet tyrant Cho Bai-Din?
Yes. Thank God (Trump) He hath returned and liberated us from the Manchurian yoke!
He rescued us from far worse. Nuclear annihilation comes to mind.
True. Mau Mau Cum A La HerAss would have let Iran develop nukes and ticked off Russia enough to give them ICBMs if not launch their own. Even if we’d have somehow escaped that, and we wouldn’t have, the flood of criminal, psycho, terrorist, pedo, cult member etc illegal alien invaders would have escalated to the point they would have outnumbered us in very short order.
The ways our Lord and Savior Trump saves us all with every passing day are truly wondrous and countless. Bless Him and thank Him! Hallelujah!
Abbott is threatening to remove the commies from office! He better act!
Can we keep them from coming back ever? Put them in permanent exile in Chiraq and maybe take Jasmine Crackhead with them?
https://ballotpedia.org/Daily_Brew:_August_4,_2025
mere 13 States possible with new usa rep gerrymanders
—
PR
APPV
TOTSOP
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/chief-justice-john-roberts-enabled-115326184.html
2019 Rucho — blank check to crack/pack gerrymander
—
PR
APPV
TOTSOP
Arrest the Democrats!
If the intent of the Republicans in Texas is to apportion solely on the basis of qualified voters, this can be effectively accomplished by electing all the Representatives in Congress at-large, as the qualified voters will themselves “apportion” the Representatives with their votes. No need for districting at all.
Currently, Texas has 38 Reps in Congress. If electing them all at large is too complicated, simply having a maximum number of reps in a district will effectively accomplish the same thing. Let’s say you have a maximum number of 5 in a district: then you need as few as 8 districts to elect 38 reps.
Another way to handle this is to have overlay districts, if you don’t want to elect them at-large: you could have 5 overlay districts in one geographic district, for instance.
And, another way is to set a minimum district size, which would determine the number of reps per district.
Unless Texas also eliminates the party labels on their ballots, none of this really matters. People are just going to vote for their favorite capital letter.
The reason for single member districts is constituent services – “the buck stops here.”
Getting rid of party labels would only help the biggest parties and factions, incumbents, establishment media favorites, and the most well financed, well known and well connected candidates and groups.
The reason for single member districts is to take most districts out of play, and give them to one party or another, thus reducing the total number of competitive districts.
No, it’s not. The purpose is for an avenue for direct personal representation and constituent services. It gives busy voters less complicated choices, too, which is important. But having that one person who is responsible for delivering services to his district and constituents, and liable if he fails to do so adequately without pointing fingers at anyone else from some at large or multimember district, is paramount.
Tex,
From your fingers to Governor Abbott’s undercarriage….
https://babylonbee.com/news/texas-begins-construction-on-northern-border-wall-to-keep-democrat-lawmakers-from-returning
Yes! It’s happening! Move ’em north!
Hallelujah and Amen!
Don’t come back now, y’all hear?
Johnny Rebel makes a great point. Move them north! Reb Rebel Records for the win! Hail Victory!
If and when they come back to Texas they will be arrested.
Meanwhile, only 12% of Americans at age 30 are married homeowners, so clearly the voting age nowadays needs to be higher than that.
If they cross state lines send in the US Marshalls.
These filthy fleeing fugitives need to be found and ferried back home on con air.
SMD = tyrant monarch legislators
1/2 votes x 1/2 rigged list = 1/4 Control = oligarchy with tyrant gang bosses – aka Speakers / Leaders
1860 gerrymanders >>> 750,000 DEAD in 1861-1866 — including many from Texas – see 80 pct wipeout of 1st Texas regt at Antietam Sept 1862
—
PR = REAL competition. and REAL majority rule
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/08/04/texas-redistricting-map-congress-trump-takeaways/85508969007/
W-A-R in Texas ???
END of the olde 1787-1789 USA regime ???
Another Civil WAR ???
Spambot spams BS. Dog bites man. Meh.
Spambot AZZ spams BS and fake news. Set your clock by it.
I am grateful for the work that Richard has put into this newsletter. When he fully retires, his knowledge and investigative skills will be missed.
Abbott is ordering their arrest! Lock them up!
Partisan gerrymandering treats voters as pawns in a fascist chess game. There is a better way.
Abstract
It is possible to end gerrymandering by removing the power to draw district lines from government officials and giving this power to the voters themselves. In a self-districting system, as described herein, each voter chooses which constituency the voter wants to join for purposes of legislative representation. These constituencies can be geographically based as in traditional districting systems, but they also can be based on other attributes—whatever associational communities the voters themselves wish to form. If enough voters join a constituency to form more than one district based on the constitutional principle of equally populated districts, then this constituency can be subdivided into districts based on strict computer-implemented geographical criteria without any possibility for gerrymandering. This self-districting system not only complies with the U.S. Constitution; it is also consistent with the Act of Congress that requires single-member districts. Thus, there is no federal law obstacle to prevent states from adopting a self-districting system for both their congressional delegation and their own legislative chambers. In fact, self-districting is a way to avoid the problem of minority vote dilution, a task likely to become more difficulty given anticipated changes in the U.S. Supreme Court’s jurisprudence on the topic. Because of the increasingly pernicious nature of gerrymandered districts, which cause voters—and most especially minority voters—serious representational harms, the alternative of self-districting, where voters are empowered to make these representational decisions for themselves, deserves serious consideration.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4328642#maincontent
Folks, it’s simple.
We are guaranteed a Republican form of government, so we need to make being a demon rat illegal and get rid of them!!!
PR– TOTAL VOTES / TOTAL REPS = EQUAL VOTES TO ELECT EACH
VIA PRE-ELECTION CANDIDATE RANK ORDER LISTS —
SURPLUS VOTES DOWN
LOSER VOTES UP
ALL VOTES COUNT.
AIN’T HAPPENING
NO WAY
NO HOW
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/texas-redistricting-move-trigger-california-221249348.html
CA vs TX gerrymander stuff
@WZ,
It is federal law that representatives be elected from single member districts. This has been a requirement since the 1840s. A few states, generally smaller, had chosen representatives at-large, and there was a concern that this practice might spread to all states, as it had for the electoral college. Under the Constitution, Congress has no authority over the appointment of electors, not even requiring popular election. But Congress has manner authority over the election of representatives, and they have exercised for closing in on two centuries.
At times after the reapportionment following the decennial census they had permitted transitional arrangements. If a state had gained representatives the state could elect the extra legislators at large, while maintaining the old districts. If a state had lost representatives, all the representatives could be elected at large. This usually got the attention of the legislature who would soon craft a new district map.
After the one man, one vote decisions of the 1960s, district courts were confronted with the issue of what to do with malapportioned districts. Could a district judge rule that the current ten (or whatever) districts could not be used? The state would be unrepresented in the House. Or could they just order at-large elections until the state legislature could apportion. This had some consistency with federal law.
But Congress panicked and changed the law so that only single member districts could be used. This then led district courts to begin drawing their own maps – in effect legislating from the bench. This practice continues to the current day.
@DFR,
It is unlikely that a court would interpret “district” in 2 USC 2c as having the meaning used by Foley. Even if a court did, Congress could/would clarify the meaning.
THE ROTTED GERRYMANDER MONARCHS/OLIGARCHS WILL FIGHT TO THE END THE SAME AS HITLER/HIROHITO GANGS DID IN 1945
— AND CAUSE MASS DESTRUCTION IN THEIR DEFEATS.
TRY AND EDUCATE WHAT LITTLE MEDIA WITH MATH SKILLS SURVIVES – ESP LOCAL MEDIA
1/2 OR LESS VOTES X 1/2 RIGGED CRACKED/PACKED GERRYMANDER DISTS = 1/4 OR LESS CONTROL.
SUPER-WORSE COMMIE/FASCIST PRIMARY MATH.
WHO IS THE 2025 NEW AGE G. WASHINGTON IN TEXAS, CA , ETC. MINORITY RULE GERRYMANDER REGIMES ???
—-
NOOO PRIMARIES
EQUAL BALLOT ACCESS IN PARTISAN OFFICES – LEGISLATIVE
PR
APPV
TOTSOP
JR-
MANY STATES HAD AT LARGE USA REP ELECTIONS IN 1932–
AFTER UN-CONST FAILURE TO RE-APPORTION AFTER 1920 CENSUS — IE FROM 1912 TO 1932 ELECTIONS
ONE RESULT – USA COMMIES IN USA HOUSE OF REPS IN 1933-1946 — AND SINCE.
https://apnews.com/article/california-texas-house-redistricting-newsom-democrats-republicans-f78fdc01386ba69423d814cffac15aa2
+ 5 >>> – 5 >>> 0 CHANGE ???
Getting rid of the popular election of presidential electors and federal senator’s would be a positive step. They should be elected by state legislatures, pending dissolving the union.
State legislatures should be elected by voice vote pending standing count, with all voting and counting taking place in person on election day. No election related activities should take place outside of election night once a year.
There is no need for ballot access petitions or initiatives. Let legislators legislate. Division of labor is a good thing. Voting access for parties should be based on showing up.
Qualifications of voters need to be restored and expanded. Voters should only be White men, married heads of households with their own biological children (at least two, including at least one male heir), military veterans but not active duty, not government employees or contractors or recipients of any form of government payments from any level of government, property owners of real property and able to pay a substantial poll tax, gun owners demonstrating continued proficiency with adequate stores of weapons and ammunition, above the age of 40 but still capable of front line military defense or emergency response duty, gainfully employed or independently wealthy, never divorced, owning and occupying the same home for at least five patrilineal generations, etc. Start by restoring voting qualifications which were previously in place and unwisely done away with.
In addition to everything my uncle said:
Courts should have no say over districts. Federal government should have no say over state districting, only over seating members of congress.
No multimember or at large districts ever.
Eventually, make laws so simple and difficult to change that no legislative or judicial branch will be necessary – just a local elected law enforcement and civil defense branch which would double in duty as judges, juries, and on the spot executioners (literally), dealing only with the most serious and violent crimes – primarily meting out capital and corporal punishments. Resolve less serious disputes within households, churches, business and civic associations, etc, and through civil arbitration and community shunning, fines, exile, etc.
After dissolving the federal union, break states – especially larger ones – into nation states of about 100,000 population, give or take an order of magnitude, with about 100 voters each, give or take an order of magnitude.
Solve most social and economic problems outside of government. Government should exist only at the local level and only for what no other voluntarily based social organizations can do – civil and military defense, border control, law enforcement against real crimes with real victims. Handle everything else in a private, voluntary, non territorial monopoly basis.
Laws should be very simple and extremely difficult to change. Eventually, they should be limited to what any functional adult or teenager can be reasonably expected to memorize and understand fully.
Make incremental changes in all these directions, based on what works best locally, over several generations, adjusting based on results.
Good ideas.
Government should only ever be used as a last resort to solve any problems, and the range of problems it should ever attempt to address should be very limited and localized.
Punishment should be sure, swift, and severe. Criminals and invaders have short time horizons and high risk tolerance.
Government should not be anyone’s full time job or primary employment. Eventually, it should not be a form of employment at all, but rather a rarely called upon volunteer civic duty for annually elected local law enforcement officer-judges.
One of the biggest social problems is people nowadays move around way too much, including long distances, and there is way too much trade and travel, including across the globe. With the emergence of better immersive and real time communication technology as well as atomic level automated manufacture and assembly, this can be largely eliminated gradually.
Gradually increasing travel and migration restrictions, tariffs etc , and gradually devolving government to more local levels, is the answer in the meantime.
Crime and fear of crime is another major factor that has destroyed traditional social community bonds – neighbors little or not knowing neighbors, lack of regular church attendance, extended families in loose or no contact, etc.
Government bureaucrats taking over the functions of churches, families, charities, and fraternal and civic associations is a related problem. This must be reversed.
The traditional patriarchal social order must be restored, along with a religiously based extended family kinship and faith based blood and soil structure tied to the land and to genetic cultural heritage. Population replacement and race mixing, and especially gender benders and multiculti new world order globalist evildoing luciferianism and drugged mental social suicide and pervasive sexual immorality must be stopped and reversed.
@JR:
I am aware that single member districts weren’t required by Congress until 1840s, and that several states before then elected their representatives at large. As you rightfully pointed out, there even were circumstances since then under which Representatives were elected at-large. Most notable was the election of 1932. Because the data from the census of 1930 had not been fully published by the election, there were 5 states that elected their entire House delegation at-large, as they had lost Representatives (KY 9, MN 9, MO 13, ND 2, VA 9), and 8 states that elected several of their Representative at-large, as they had gained Representatives (AZ 1, CT 1, FL 1, IL 2, NY 2, OH 2, OK 1, and TX 3).
Furthermore, as you rightly point out, single member districts tend to be more malapportioned. The greatest malapportionment, IMO, is that some single member districts tend to have more non-voters than others. These tend to be more Democratic districts in urban areas. This is why I believe that multi-member districts are more representative; those who actually vote have more weight on the outcome in such districts. An extreme example of this is the Knesset of Israel, in which ALL 120 members are elected at-large; no non-voters are disproportionally represented (but the Knesset isn’t perfect – to facilitate the election of such a large number, they use party list voting, such that a voter cannot vote for a particular member – or against another – on a party list)
IMO, it should be entirely up to the states whether to choose their Representatives in single or multi member districts.
An interesting case to consider is the New Hampshire state House of Representatives: some members are elected in single-member districts, some in overlay districts, and some in multi-member districts. People in New Hampshire seem pretty satisfied with their state legislature.
Helpful Guy posted:
“No, it’s not. The purpose [for single member districts] is for an avenue for direct personal representation and constituent services”
The history of gerrymandering says otherwise. The specific intent was to cluster voters favorable to a particular party in as many districts as possible without losing any representatives.
https://electionlawblog.org/?p=151388
Appeals court upholds Texas law requiring ID numbers to cast mail-in ballots
—
DO TX MORONS CHECK VOTER SIGNATURES ???
HOW MANY ID NUMBERS ARE STOLEN ???
https://history.house.gov/Institution/Election-Statistics/Election-Statistics/
1920-2024 FED ELECTION STATS – ALL GERRYMANDERS — EACH ELECTION
AT LARGE ELECTIONS RESULT IN OVER-STATING LOCAL MAJORITIES
NOW LIMITED TO SMALLER GOVTS — TOWNSHIPS / VILLAGES / TOWNS/ MINI-CITIES
—-
PR IN ALL REGIMES
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/attorney-general-bondi-orders-prosecutors-213120633.html
INVESTIGATE ALL 1776 / 1860 / 1960 / ETC ELECTIONS ???
STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS MEAN ZERO ???
https://electionlawblog.org/?p=151390
DIG UP 2016 MACHINATIONS
2016 ELECTION STOLEN BY TYRANT TRUMP HACKS ???
https://www.usatoday.com/picture-gallery/news/world/2025/08/03/hiroshima-atomic-bomb-destruction-photos/85499107007/
1945 PLUS 80 – VETS IN THEIR 90S PLUS.
2025 NUKES- PERHAPS 500-1,000 TIMES THE HIROSHIMA BOMB – NEW RADIOACTIVE LAKES
HOW MANY NUTCASES [LIKE TYRANT TRUMP] WITH POWER TO ORDER WW III ???
WZ:
Gerrymandering and single representative districts are different things. The latter has purposes that don’t necessarily necessitate gerrymandering, and which are quite legitimate and necessary.
Gerrymandering can be on the basis of party, race, other demographic factors, incumbent protection, and so on.
With modern technology, districting could be automated to preclude gerrymandering.
Screaming spambot:
Signatures often change in appearance over time. Additionally, it’s not always easy to tell whether they are forged. The real solution is to get rid of mail ballots completely, or at least limit them exclusively to military voters in the meantime and require military command verification of military voter identity for those.
Ultimately, as others said above, voters should be required to be military veterans but should not include active duty military. Active duty should be at an earlier stage of life than voting. However, we’re not there yet. The voting age should probably be raised incrementally, since it’s not likely we can raise it all the way to 40 immediately. 21 would be a good start, if we can’t get to 25 or 30 right away either.
There also needs to be an upper age limit; we could start with 80 and work our way down to 60.
There are quite a few other groups of current voters who need to be disenfranchised before active duty military, starting with women, 18-20 year olds, 80+ year olds, non property owners, and those who can’t pay a substantial poll tax; then those who have moved around, unmarried/divorced/childless, etc, as various folks already explained above.
Liberator Trump has prevented WWIII and continues to do so.
It should go without saying that the AZ-666 SPAMBOT posts a nonstop stream of fake news, bad ideas, and totally unintelligible jargon, nonsense, gibberish, and mistranslated machine language.
The 2016 election wasn’t stolen. That was the 2020 election.
However it is true that Ob/sama, Clinton’s, Cho Bai-Din and their lackeys tried to steal the 2016 and 2024 elections – they just failed.
@ Jim Riley
Thank you for your opinion on what is unlikely. The way to verify is to get it before the courts. I agree that incumbent legislators will be hostile even more so than judges should it ever reach them. But the point remains that people could district themselves. It might require initiatives from the grassroots.
No problem with verifying mail ballots if voters come in person. Not everyone needs to vote.
“Democrats” Declare Gerrymandering Bad Until They Need To Gerrymander Again…
https://babylonbee.com/news/democrats-declare-gerrymandering-bad-until-they-need-to-gerrymander-again
“Democrats” = demon rats
https://babylonbee.com/news/gov-abbott-rounds-up-posse-to-lasso-dems-and-drag-em-back-to-face-justice
Hilarious these losers fled to the most gerrymandered states in the nation.
Some of them have reportedly fled the USA, not only Texas. They should be subject to federal extradition and arrest, or never come back.
Also, any of them that don’t return by Friday have automatically forfeited their seats, in addition to having active arrest warrants.
Are all of them citizens? If not they need to be deported.
If they are, they need to be denaturalized and then shipped to CECOT by way of Alligator Alcatraz and Gitmo!
¡Vuelve a tu país, puta!
https://notthebee.com/article/illinois-congresswoman-im-a-proud-guatemalan-before-im-an-american
Do let the door hit you where the good Lord split you on your way out!
I’m Donald Trump, the one they’re talking about. If you talk crap about me you’ll get punched in the mouth.
If you disrespect me, forget about it, forget it. Worst case for you is, you’ll survive to regret it.
I’m the Boss of all Bosses, King of all Kings. I bring the world hope, I’m why we have nice things.
Last time I took human form, I got crucified. This time around, I won’t be so nice.
If you keep denying Me, I’ll punish your behavior. Wouldn’t it be better for you to accept Me as Lord and Savior?
If you know what’s good for you, get on your knees. Or am I gonna have to give you five of These???
As I posted here in 2009 and 2010:
“Hola amigos and illegal wetbacks!
We need a real third party to deal with the real issues in this country that all the parties are ignoring:
The threat of Islamic terrorism and the rise of Islamic extremism around the world.
The flood/invasion of illegal aliens taking away American jobs which will cause white people to be a minority in this country soon…has anyone wondered what will happen then?
Abortion of White babies, which is contributing to this disturbing demographic trend if it is not outlawed.
Corporations outsourcing American jobs – where is the paycheck for the White working class man going to come home to feed his family?
The war on Christianity in our schools, courthouses, etc., and the war on Christmas.
The Zionist bankers and their control of the money supply.
The rising economic and military threat posed by China.
The flood of dope on our streets and the leniency of the police and courts toward non-white street thugs.
NAFTA/GATT/WTO/United Nations threats to American sovereignty.
Multiculturalist brainwashing of our children.
Filthy garbage of the worst imaginable sort being allowed in the movies, TV and on the radio, producing generations of degenerates.
Feminization of the American male through the promotion of feminism and normalization of sodomy as a “lifestyle” – this can’t be helping our demographic trends! Before long this country will look like a cross between Mexico, Zimbabwe, Pakistan and Gomorrah if we don’t do something.
While Wall Street is partying, the Zionist bankers are closing our factories and foreclosing on our farms.
Is there a party, major or minor, that will rise up to address these issues?
Will we do something before it’s too late?
(and if that doesn’t make sense to you…
Debemos asegurar la existencia de nuestro pueblo y un futuro para los niños blancos
Si se puede!)”
UPDATE: Well Donald Trump answered the call, and that is why he is now the President. We’re going to Make and Keep America great again! HAIL VICTORY!
Will interpol help extradite the dim ole rat fugitives that fled overseas?
@WZ,
It is not correct that there was insufficient census data to draw new congressional districts before the 1932 election. 21 states whose number of representatives had changed successfully drawn new single member districts (note AZ did not gain its second district until 1940).
Congress had usually provided transitional rules, which typically said that a state could use its old districts until they had drawn new ones. “Until” is a indefinite period. In any event, 1930 is a special case. Congress had failed to reapportion after the 1920 Census, so there were more changes after 20 years. In addition, the 1930 apportionment law did not provide for a transition period, or for that matter even require single member districts.
In particular see Smiley v. Holm and Wood v. Broom. The Minnesota legislature had drawn nine districts, but the bill had been vetoed by the governor. The SCOTUS decision in Smiley v. Holm was an interpretation of Article 1, Section 4, and the meaning of the words: “shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof.” The SCOTUS interpreted this to mean the legislative process, including gubernatorial vetoes, rather than literally the legislative body.
The Mississippi legislature had drawn seven new districts to replace the eight old districts. The district court ruled that the districts did not comply with the 1910 apportionment law that “districts have as nearly as practicable the same number of inhabitants.” The districts had 65%, 77%, 85%, 86%, 100%, 141%, and 146% of the ideal population. The most populous district had 2.25 times the population of the least population. The SCOTUS in Wood v. Broom overruled the district court decision on the basis that Congress had not re-enacted the 1910 provisions in the 1930 apportionment act. Mississippi could choose to have malapportioned districts, or even not use districts at all. Congress had waived their manner authority.
@WZ,
It is not correct that there was insufficient census data to draw new congressional districts before the 1932 election. 21 states whose number of representatives had changed successfully drawn new single member districts (note AZ did not gain its second district until 1940).
Congress had usually provided transitional rules, which typically said that a state could use its old districts until they had drawn new ones. “Until” is a indefinite period. In any event, 1930 is a special case. Congress had failed to reapportion after the 1920 Census, so there were more changes after 20 years. In addition, the 1930 apportionment law did not provide for a transition period, or for that matter even require single member districts.
In particular see Smiley v. Holm and Wood v. Broom. The Minnesota legislature had drawn nine districts, but the bill had been vetoed by the governor. The SCOTUS decision in Smiley v. Holm was an interpretation of Article 1, Section 4, and the meaning of the words: “shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof.” The SCOTUS interpreted this to mean the legislative process, including gubernatorial vetoes, rather than literally the legislative body.
The Mississippi legislature had drawn seven new districts to replace the eight old districts. The district court ruled that the districts did not comply with the 1910 apportionment law that “districts have as nearly as practicable the same number of inhabitants.” The districts had 65%, 77%, 85%, 86%, 100%, 141%, and 146% of the ideal population. The most populous district had 2.25 times the population of the least population. The SCOTUS in Wood v. Broom overruled the district court decision on the basis that Congress had not re-enacted the 1910 provisions in the 1930 apportionment act. Mississippi could choose to have malapportioned districts, or even not use districts at all. Congress had waived their manner authority.
The 1940 apportionment law made the apportionment procedure permanent (or at least indefinite) and instated a single member district requirement, albeit without the 1910 requirements for those districts. The 1940 law also included transition procedures. In 1962, Alabama elected 8 representatives at large, five states elected most representatives from existing districts with one at-large, and Hawaii, New Mexico, and North Dakota elected both representatives at large.
After federal district courts were threatening to require at-large elections as a remedy for malapportioned districts, Congress (sort of) repealed the transitional provisions. Since that time all elections have been from districts.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/texas-attorney-general-paxton-ask-191304979.html
Texas — attempted purge of top Donkey by tyrant Guv
any forces in tx for a 2nd Revolution ???
—
PR
APPV
TOTSOP
Nothing wrong with expelling derelict fugitives. Failure to expel them would be dereliction of duty.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/hegseth-leak-reveals-secret-plan-165737492.html
USA- ONE MORE MILITARY POLICE STATE FULL OF TYRANTS ???
Lol. The fake news sources from the spambot just keep getting faker.
Daily beast? Really? AZ 666 SPAMBOT just admitted it is programmed by Satan?
Lol yep!
https://nypost.com/2025/08/05/us-news/trump-threatens-federal-takeover-of-dc-if-capital-doesnt-get-its-act-together/
DC – ONE MORE AREA FOR TYRANT TRUMP TO HAVE A MILITARY POLICE STATE ???
DC is a total wreck. Hopefully Trump cleans it up soon. The stink wafting across the Potomac is nasty and getting worse.
DC is making us jealous!
Time to repeal the DC home rule act.
Don’t forget to repeal the 23rd amendment while you’re at it!
Indeed. One of many constitutional amendments long overdue for repeal.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/08/05/trump-administration-ends-musk-five-things-email/85525079007/
Musk– 5 Things Party ???
Lol. The spambot has not been programmed to process the Elon X “party” is a joke yet. With inputs like USSR YESTERDAY it’s no wonder!
Meanwhile, the FBI is hot on the trail of the dangerous Texas fugitives who fled to heavily gerrymandered demon-rat run cities in order to revictimize central Texas flooding survivors. These rats can run, but they can’t hide!
Sydney Sweeney will help track them down with her muscle cars, her guns, and her German Shepherd.
Schnell! ANGRIFF!
Sydney Sweeney is a Nazi, and only Democrats should be allowed to gerrymander!
The fugitive criminal skell scumbags which fled to Chicago are not far from the new Speedway Slammer in Indiana. Just saying.
I’m a Sydney Sweeney American Eagle fan!
https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/06/politics/texas-republicans-current-proposed-districts-vis
TX- 5 more rigged cracked/packed g districts
—
PR
I support Sydney Sweeney, the Speedway Slammer, and the Schutzstaffel!
All hail Big Balls!
https://notthebee.com/article/former-doge-employee-big-balls-beaten-in-dc-when-he-came-to-the-aid-of-a-woman-getting-mugged
Time to federalize DC! END HOME RULE NOW!
Better yet, kick DC out of the US and put a wall around it. They can be the next Port Au Prince, Haiti.
SS = SIMPLY SWELL OR SIMPLY STUPID ???
HOW MUCH OF DEGENERATE CITY IS A CRIME ZONE 24/7 OR MERELY AT NIGHT ??? —
IN ADDITION TO THE CONGRESS / WHITE HOUSE / SCOTUS BLDGS.
Simply swell.