Two U.S. District Courts Refuse to Stop California Redistricting Ballot Measure Election

On October 23, U.S. District Court Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, dismissed a lawsuit filed by a Texas member of Congress, Ronny Jackson. The case had been filed in Texas to stop the California election. The plaintiff, Jackson, claimed that if the California election went ahead, that would make it likely that Democrats would gain a majority in the U.S. House in November 2026, and that would injure Jackson because he would have less influence. Jackson v Weber, n.d. of Texas, 2:25cv-197. Judge Kacsmaryk, a Trump appointee, said Jackson did not have standing. Here is the order of dismissal.

On October 24, U.S. District Court Judge Kenly Kato, a Biden appointee, refused to enjoin the California election in a lawsuit filed by Steve Hilton, a California Republican candidate for Governor in 2026. Hilton v Weber, c.d., 8:25cv-1988. The case is still alive but the judge said the lawsuit can continue after the election, if Prop. 50 passes. Hilton had charged that the districts would not be equal in population, and also that California precedent doesn’t merit mid-decade districting. Here is his Complaint.


Comments

Two U.S. District Courts Refuse to Stop California Redistricting Ballot Measure Election — 1 Comment

  1. G MATH IN THE G WARS –

    1/2 OR LESS VOTES X 1/2 RIGGED CRACKED/PACKED G DISTS = 1/4 OR LESS CONTROL.

    MUCH WORSE EXTREMIST PRIMARY MATH.

    SIMPLE P.R.

    TOTAL VOTES / TOTAL MEMBERS = EQUAL VOTES TO ELECT EACH
    VIA PRE-ELECTION RCV CANDIDATE LISTS OF OTHER CANDS

    SURPLUS VOTES DOWN
    LOSER VOTES UP
    A-L-L VOTES COUNT
    BOTH MAJORITY RULE [DEMOCRACY] AND MINORITY REPRESENTATION

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.