U.S. District Court Decision in Credico Case Tough to Predict, but will Come Soon

On October 19, a U.S. District Court in Manhatten heard oral arguments in Credico v New York State Board of Elections.  The issue is whether it is constitutional to force Randy Credico, the joint nominee of the Libertarian and Anti-Prohibition Parties for U.S. Senate, to be limited to appearing only once on the ballot.  New York lets two qualified parties jointly nominate the same candidate, and when that happens, that candidate is listed on two lines.  New York also lets a qualified party and an unqualified party jointly nominate the same candidate, and when that happens, the candidate is also listed on two lines.

But when two unqualified parties jointly nominate the same person, he or she must be limited to appearing on only one line, although both party labels appear in tiny print next to the name of that candidate.

A decision will be quick.  Observers in the courtroom feel the decision could go either way.


Comments

U.S. District Court Decision in Credico Case Tough to Predict, but will Come Soon — 2 Comments

  1. More than a bit late to reprint any ballots ???

    Will the first 2011-2012 ballot access case be filed 3 Nov 2010 — or a few days/weeks later ???

    Can the genius judge detect EQUAL in the EQUAL protection clause in 14th Amdt, Sec. 1 ???

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.