On April 6, bills were introduced in each House of Congress to provide for public funding for candidates for Congress. The Senate Bill only deals with candidates for U.S. Senate and is S.750. The House bill only deals with candidates for U.S. House and is HR 1404.
The bills do not discriminate on the basis of the candidate’s partisan affiliation or lack of affiliation. The bills therefore resemble the Maine and Arizona public funding laws, and are very different from Connecticut’s public funding law.
The sponsor of the Senate bill is Senator Dick Durbin (D-Illinois). The Senate bill has 12 co-sponsors. The sponsor of the House bill is Representative John Larson (D-Connecticut). It has 46 co-sponsors.
Supporters of the bills have set up a web page, http://fairelectionsnow.org. The web page suggests that the wording on the bills is identical to similar bills in 2009, S.752 and HR 1826. The Library of Congress doesn’t have the wording of the new bills posted yet. The web page set up by the supporters of the bill contains a factual error; the web page says Senator Arlen Specter is a co-sponsor, but he is no longer a U.S. Senator.
How many taxpayers want ANY part of their taxes being used for TV/radio/internet attack ads by their political ENEMIES ???
What is the meaning of this sentence from the supporters’ website: “Joint fundraising committees between candidates and parties would be prohibited”? Does this mean jointly between one candidate and his/her party, or to candidates running in different districts doing joint fundraising, as a slate?
#2, good question, and good example of a badly-worded bill.
We (the people) should not be funding political candidates.
This is not the kind of argument you were sent to Washington to engage.
It was my pleasure locating your site yesterday. I came here this day hoping to get new things. I was not let down. Your ideas with new methods on this topic were helpful and a good help to me. Thank you for making time to create these things as well as for sharing your thoughts.