U.S. Supreme Court Seems Likely to Hear West Virginia Redistricting Lawsuit

On January 20, the U.S. Supreme Court stayed the decision of a 3-judge court in West Virginia. The 3-judge court had invalidated the West Virginia U.S. House district boundaries. Here is the U.S. Supreme Court order, which implies that the Court wants to decide this case for itself. The 3-judge court had struck down the legislature’s redistricting plan because the three districts differed in population. The difference between the district with the highest population, and the district with the lowest population, was three-fourths of 1%.

There is a fair amount of precedent that when the normal petitioning period for minor party and independent candidates is shrunk, due to late redistricting, states must either extend the petitioning deadlines, or reduce the number of signatures needed. Because redistricting is taking a great deal of time to be settled in many states, there will be opportunities in many states this year for some temporary reductions in the number of signatures needed, especially for district office.


Comments

U.S. Supreme Court Seems Likely to Hear West Virginia Redistricting Lawsuit — No Comments

  1. It is gerrymander W-A-R in ALL States for ALL gerrymander district lines — PACK the Enemies, Crack the rest.

    Try and get a bare majority of districts with 55 plus percent winners — a *safe seat* majority with 10 percent winning margins.

    How EVIL stupid are the math MORONS in SCOTUS ???

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.