Wall Street Journal Prints Letter Pointing Out Oklahoma Supreme Court Inconsistency

The December 6 issue of the Wall Street Journal carries a letter by an Oklahoma state legislator, mentioning the double standard used by the Oklahoma Supreme Court on the issue of who can circulate initiative petitions in that state. See it at this link.

The Oklahoma Supreme Court has been inconsistent on the issue of whether persons temporarily living in Oklahoma may circulate an initiative petition. When an initiative that the Court liked was in jeopardy (the initiative to ban cock-fighting), the Court seemed to think it was OK to allow temporary residents to circulate. But when the Court saw an initiative it didn’t like (the 2006 Taxpayers Bill of Rights), it not only invalidated the initiative, it issued a ruling that made it possible for ex post facto prosecution of the initiative’s proponents.


Comments

Wall Street Journal Prints Letter Pointing Out Oklahoma Supreme Court Inconsistency — 5 Comments

  1. How can I establish credit again if they don’t give me a chance. I used to have excellent credit until my husband ruined that because he never worked. I’m now divorced and would like to try to get my credit back. I also have unpaid medical bills. Please advise if

    discover card rate chart

    R56ma87de

  2. Good Day! Need an advice. My credit is not good. I have applied for credit cards twice and was denied. What is wrong with me? Can I still have a hope to get a credit card to solve some financial problems? I have found one site that presents bad credit cards. There is a note that I can not be rejected. Is this true?

    discoery card

    Ne72Ma9rod

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.