Utah Bill to Impose Filing Fees on Write-in Candidates Fails to Pass

The Utah legislature adjourned for the year on the evening of February 5. SB 126 failed to pass the House. It had passed the Senate unanimously in January 2008.

The bill would have forced declared write-in candidates to pay the same filing fee that ballot-listed candidates must pay (only “paupers” are exempt). Utah filing fees are high. For U.S. Senate, for example, they are approximately $1,200.

The probable reason for the bill’s failure to pass, was that I e-mailed all the Utah House members that similar filing fees for write-in candidates had been declared unconstitutional in federal court in Maryland and West Virginia, and by state court in California. Also the Utah ACLU helped circulate this information.

The basis for these court decisions is the principle that the only permissible reason for filing fees is to keep ballots from being too crowded. Normally, governments cannot require either voters or candidates to pay money, in order to vote or to run for office. Despite this general rule, filing fees are permitted (for those who can afford them) because they are needed for the compelling reason of keeping ballots uncluttered. But fees on write-ins obviously don’t relate to that purpose.


Comments

Utah Bill to Impose Filing Fees on Write-in Candidates Fails to Pass — No Comments

  1. Richard,

    I couldn’t find any court cases that said that the only reason to have filing fees is to keep the ballot uncrowded. I did find a few that said fees for indigents is unconstitutional.

    I wonder because Ohio requires the same filing fee for write-ins as it does ballot-listed candidates. These fees are by no means prohibitive ($100 for statewide office, $10 for many local offices). I have considered running for office as a write-in and while $100 is not prohibitively expensive for me, it is a relatively large amount of money for me.

    Thanks for any information you might have.

  2. Bullock v Carter, and Lubin v Panish, set forth the basic principles. The specific cases striking down fees for write-ins are Phillips v Hechler (from West Virginia), Dixon v Maryland State Bd. of Elections (from Maryland), and Steiner v Mihaly (from California).

  3. Thank you, Richard. I plan on using this information to get such filing fees removed in Kentucky. Any suggestions on the best way to proceed?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.