Prince Edward Island Voters Will Vote in November 2016 on Whether to Use Proportional Representation

In November 2016, the voters of Canada’s smallest province, Prince Edward Island, will vote on whether to use proportional representation in future elections for the provincial legislative body. See this story.


Comments

Prince Edward Island Voters Will Vote in November 2016 on Whether to Use Proportional Representation — 6 Comments

  1. ALL current AREA representation stuff is from the DARK AGE —

    i.e. the creation of the English House of Commons in the late 1200s — a mere 700 plus years ago.

    P.R. has been around since the 1840s repeat 1840s.

    Inexact –
    Party Seats = Total Seats x Party Votes / Total Votes

    Exact –
    Seat Winners would have a Voting Power equal to the final votes each gets directly from voters and indirectly via losing candidates (via pre-election rank order lists).

    Save Democracy — the monarchs/oligarchs (i.e. the ONE percent monsters) are on the march to ENSLAVE most of the world.

  2. Canada with its 3 to 5 larger parties has SEVERE ANTI-Democracy minority rule in its various legislative bodies.

    1/2 or less votes x 1/2 pack/crack RIGGED gerrymander districts = 1/4 or less MINORITY RULE CONTROL.

    In most Canada regimes about 20 (repeat 20) percent control.

    Actual result — de facto MONARCHY regimes in the person of the various robot party hack prime/first ministers.

    i.e. Canada is a third world nation regarding the stability of the banana republic regime —
    Quebec, east, central, west — all ready to blow up and separate.

  3. It’s time we treat pluralists with the same aggressive treatment that they have been giving to us proportionalists. We will be aggressively removing them from the United Coalition under my plan in 2016. No more “Mr. Nice Guy”, we will be holding them accountable for thier past, present and future actions against our United Coalition.

  4. This is a recommendation to the legislature, which will make the final decision on the format of the plebiscite, and the support needed for a change to be made.

    In 2005, PEI’ers rejected a change to an alternate system, with only 36% support for a change.

  5. I’m not mentioning the coward’s names here but the pluralists who have thwarted PR are many.

    Thete is a deep misunderstanding about the correct use of PR by the genetal public because of their ill-advised actions.

    In 2016 the United Coalition will be removing their names as they are not welcomed. Their harmful work has damaged the needs of the 100%.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.