On June 28, 2016, 120 Democrats filed a lawsuit against the Democratic National Committee, charging that the committee broke its own rules and helped Hillary Clinton win the Democratic presidential nomination, instead of being neutral. The plaintiffs include 104 individuals who contributed to Bernie Sanders, 7 individuals who contributed to the Democratic National Committee, and 9 individuals who are registered Democrats. The case is Wilding v DNC Services Corporation, southern district of Florida, 0:16cv-61511.
The plaintiffs request that the lawsuit be considered a class action. The Complaint says that evidence that the DNC was not neutral is available because two groups of hackers from Russia broke into the party’s computer network a year ago, and then some of the documents were posted to a website called Guccifer 2.0. The case is assigned to Judge William J. Zlock, a Reagan appointee.
Here in Illinois, courts are reluctant to interfere in the internal affairs of private organizations; however, they will do so when the organization’s rules have been applied inconsistently or arbitrarily. Is there is similar standard in the federal courts?
The robot gangster parties are public gangs regarding nominating public candidates for public offices.
See the 1989 Eu SCOTUS case.
Abolish the Electoral College.
—
P.R. and nonpartisan App.V.
Thanks to the e-mail leaks we now have the proof the not only was the DNC biased in favor of Hillary, but also schemed to discredit Bernie based on his religion.
Debbie Wasserman-Schultz resigns in disgrace as DNC Chair, only to get top position in the Clinton campaign and loads of support from the Clinton/Obama folks for her Florida House re-election campaign.
I don’t even know how I ended up here, however I thought this publish used to be good.
I do not recognize who you’re however definitely you are going to a
well-known blogger in case you aren’t already. Cheers!