George Skelton, Los Angeles Times Columnist, Admits California’s U.S. Senate Race is Boring

George Skelton, long-time political columnnist for the Los Angeles Times, says this year’s California race for U.S. Senate is very boring. Skelton is a fervent supporter of the California top-two system. At the end of his column, he says that some may blame the top-two system for the boring character of the race. But he says that idea is “nonsense.” What he does not say is that all of California’s races for Governor and U.S. Senator, since top-two started, have been boring.

In 2012, the first top-two year, the U.S. Senate race in November was between Dianne Feinstein, the Democratic incumbent, and Elizabeth Emken, a Republican.

In 2014, the next top-two year, the gubernatorial race was between incumbent Jerry Brown, a Democrat, and Republican Neel Kashkari.

The 2012 Senate race, and the 2014 gubernatorial race, were also unanimously considered by political observers to be boring. One characteristic of an interesting race is that there are more than two candidates in that race.

People like Skelton admitted that the 2012 Senate race and the 2014 gubernatorial race were boring, but said that was only because a popular incumbent was running for re-election. But now 2016 has brought California its first U.S. Senate race since 1992 with no incumbent, and, yes, it is still boring.


Comments

George Skelton, Los Angeles Times Columnist, Admits California’s U.S. Senate Race is Boring — 2 Comments

  1. P.R. will end the boring stuff for legislative body elections.

    NONPARTISAN App.V. for executive officers and judges may however become somewhat boring.

  2. CNN had lots of fun with Sanchez’s “dab” move in her debate with Harris. Wasn’t that exciting!?

    This is what happens when there are just two choices and alternative voices are excluded. And it is especially true when both candidates are from the same party and agree on so much.

    It amazes me that so many people who complain about the CPD and exclusive debates and a lack of viable options this presidential election will still support something like top-two. Quite simply, our elections should be more inclusive of third party and independent candidates, they should increase voter choice, and they should be competitive. Top-two is hostile to these goals.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.