Law Professor Rick Hasen writes here at his Election Law Blog that Judge Neil Gorsuch, President Trump’s nominee for U.S. Supreme Court, wrote an opinion in 2012 that suggests he is not favorable to ballot access or to minor parties. The case was Hassan v State of Colorado and Secretary of State Scott Gessler, 12-1190 (September 4, 2012).
Abdul Hassan was born in Guyana, but he wanted to run for President in 2012. He admitted he is not a natural born citizen (he is naturalized) but he filed six federal lawsuits against the federal government or against state election officials, saying the “natural born” clause has been implicitly repealed by new U.S. Constitutional amendments. He said he was seeking the Democratic nomination, but in two states without presidential primaries, Colorado and Iowa, he also sued to be allowed to be an independent candidate.
Judge Gorsuch ruled against him, writing the Constitution permits states to bar candidates from the ballot if it is uncontested that they do not meet the constitutional qualifications for the office. In the same opinion, Gorsuch also ruled that the natural born clause is still a valid part of the Constitution.
Gorsuch’s statement that states are permitted to bar candidates from the ballot if it is clear to everyone that they do not meet the constitutional qualifications is entirely unremarkable. No federal or state court has ever ruled any differently. Although some states have sometimes printed the names of constitutionally ineligible candidates on ballots, no court has ever forced any state to do that.
Abdul Hassan failed to persuade a single judge to rule in his favor. He was in front of six U.S. District Court judges, and these eighteen U.S. Court of Appeals Judges: D.C. Circuit Karen Henderson, Thomas Griffht, Brett Kavanaugh; First Circuit Sandra Lynch, Kermit Lipez, O. Rogeriee Thompson; Second Circuit Jon O. Newman, Joseph McLaughlin, Debra Ann Livingston; Eighth Circuit Diana E. Murphy, Morris S. Arnold, Lavenski Smith; Ninth Circuit Edward Leavy, Sidney Thomas, Mary H. Murguia; and Tenth Circuit Gorsuch, Wade Brorby, and Jerome Holmes. Some of those judges didn’t even think Hassan had standing.
Hassan appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court also, but that court refused to hear his appeal. Hassan v Colorado, 12-1187.
Not sure why Hasen bolded that last sentence. I agree with you, Richard, that this really is an unremarkable case.
ask Lt Col Lakin about this enemy combatant constitutional covenant.
A Petition for a Full Pardon, Reinstatement, and Restitution for Former Lt Col Terry Lakin – CDR Kerchner (Ret)’s Blog
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2017/01/21/a-petition-for-a-full-pardon-re-instatement-and-restitution-for-former-lt-col-terry-lakin/
CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
Lehigh Valley PA USA
ProtectOurLiberty.org
Dear Wingnut Kerchner: You mean the court-martialed birther Lakin? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Court-martial_of_Terry_Lakin
Please go away.
http://www.thepostemail.com/category/obama-birth-certificate/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_federal_judges_appointed_by_Barack_Obama
— each and every nomination and appointment and every SCOTUS cert conference since Jan 2009 up for DJT executive review.
Asked Hasen to explain why he thought this was unfavorable to third parties. I was in the LP for a couple decades, and I can’t for the life of me see where this is problematic.
I get the impression sometimes Hasen just reflexively opposes all limitations whatsoever on voting, including whether candidates are actually qualified for the office.
Brett, you may be right. At the same time, as far as actual elections, he seems to have a semi-trollish attitude toward Greens.
Petition Signers Count Passes 6000 Requesting a Full Pardon, Reinstatement, and Restitution for Former Lt Col Terry Lakin – CDR Kerchner (Ret)’s Blog
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2017/01/21/a-petition-for-a-full-pardon-re-instatement-and-restitution-for-former-lt-col-terry-lakin/