On December 1, Level the Playing Field filed this 3-page rebuttal brief, on the issue of whether additional evidence should be allowed in this case. The issue in this case is whether the Federal Election Commission has failed to apply federal campaign finance laws to the Commission on Presidential Debates. The FEC is trying to get certain evidence excluded.
Because of pluralism and single-winner elections, the establishment Ds and Rs, as well as the Green and Libertarian Party candidates and governance, are there to kick everyone in the balls when they bring a concept of unity under pure proportional representation.
For this reason alone the voters who desire unity have no use for them.
The United Coalition has been using pure proportional representation for more than twenty-two consecutive years and it works fine.
http://www.international-parliament.org/ucc.html
The Green Party and Libertarian Party bosses are only interested in the single-winner district power grab because pluralism is ingrained in the minds of their membership and that is the only way they can think.
Pluralism is not a unifying voting system and so the electoral process does not lend itself to the possibility of collaboration under pure proportional representation.
Pluralists in the Green and Libertarian Party have no time for pure proportional representation. Their time is spent on preventing pure proportional representation from getting explained or used so they only fall into the normal dysfunctional cycles of conflicts of plurality elections and psychology.
You would think with the speed of the internet that pure proportional representation would catch on instead we get the same failed attempts in democracy in the USA and abroad.
There is no need for collaboration by pluralists, and their arrogant lawsuits display their entrenched vision and perpetual need for plurality elections and the power grab that they believe they deserved in 2016.