The Economist has this interesting article about a new method for predicting how a U.S. Supreme Court Justice will rule, based on the pitch of his or her voice when questioning attorneys at oral argument. If one scrolls down to the bottom of the article, one finds that the new method predicts that Justice Anthony Kennedy will rule against the state of Wisconsin in Gill v Whitford, the case over extreme partisan gerrymandering.
Of course, there are other more traditional reasons to expect that same result, including the fact that the Court recently took a second case on the same subject from Maryland. Thanks to How Appealing for the link.
What is *extreme* gerrymander stuff ??? —
definition please.
The “efficiency gap” stuff is more New Age math nonsense.
Good luck in finding ANY eg language in the 39th Congress in 1865-1866.
The math MORON plaintiffs and their math MORON lawyers doing gerrymander cases since 1962-1964 have been too STUPID to detect —
1/2 or less votes x 1/2 rigged gerrymander districts = 1/4 or less CONTROL.
BLATANT violations of the RFG in USA Const Art IV, Sec 4 AND the EPC in 14 Amdt, Sec. 1.
RFG = having MAJORITY rule regimes in ALL State and local legislative bodies.
PR and AppV
pitch stuff — detect govt. liars ???
ONE MORE GERRYMANDER CASE — MICHIGAN
website
https://www.lwvmi.org/
—
Press release
http://www.lwvmi.org/documents/PrRelRedist12-22-17.pdf
—
Complaint
http://www.lwvmi.org/documents/RedistComplaint12-17.pdf
SEE P.16 — 1812 V 2012
—
PR AND APPV
How about ups/downs of eyebrows, fake coughs, pen twists in hands, head itching, etc. — all OCCULT MORON stuff ???