On January 10, the U.S. Supreme Court heard Husted v A. Philip Randolph Institute, 16-980. The issue is whether Ohio is breaking the federal law by the way in which it removes voters from the rolls. Here is one news story. There will be other longer stories later today. UPDATE: here is the 89-page transcript of the oral argument. Thanks to Rick Hasen for that link.
UPDATE: here is another story.
http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/husted-v-philip-randolph-institute/
Lots of briefs by the left/right usual suspects.
PR and AppV
https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-980_5426.pdf
SCOTUS argument
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/supreme-court-seems-skeptical-of-blocking-ohio-law-that-removes-voters-from-rolls/2018/01/10/65e88f8a-f626-11e7-beb6-c8d48830c54d_story.html
Standard left-right SCOTUS hacks stuff in argument.
The federal government should issue federal ID’s and require that state’s use them for federal elections. The federal government would inform the state whenever an adult changed their address.
http://www.scotusblog.com/2018/01/argument-analysis-ohio-voter-registration-practices-safe/
argument analysis
—-
JR – 666 USA ID cards ??? — with 666 USA head implant transmitters for satellite tracking next ???