On February 21, U.S. District Court Judge Lawrence Piersol struck down South Dakota ballot access laws for newly-qualifying parties. Libertarian Party of South Dakota v Krebs, 4:15cv-4111. The plaintiffs were the Libertarian Party and the Constitution Party. The case had been filed in 2015. Here is the 16-page opinion.
The opinion says that the March 27 petition deadline is too early, especially given winter weather in South Dakota. It also says the 2.5% (of the last gubernatorial vote) is also too high, given the historical record of few minor parties qualifying. The Reform Party did not qualify in South Dakota in 1996; the Green Party has never qualified; the Natural Law Party never qualified; the New Alliance Party never qualified.
The state defended the March 27 deadline by saying that deadline is necessary to give new parties their own primary in June. But the opinion says there is no state interest in requiring new or small parties to nominate by primary. It says, “In our two-party dominant system, the Republican and Democratic Parties often have more than one candidate for each political office and thus need to run in a primary election where the registered voters of each party must choose their candidate. But Defendants have not explained why this rationale should apply to new political parties.” UPDATE: here is a news story. FURTHER UPDATE: here is a news story from the Argus Leader.
Good news!
Wow. This is great. Thanks again for all your work, Richard.
ONE more separate is unequal MORON case since 1968.
Each election for an office is NEW.
EQUAL ballot access tests for ALL candidates for the SAME office in the SAME election area.
Alabama Governor George C. Wallace got on the ballot in 1968 as the American Independent Party candidate. All others on the two parties, American and American Independent, Schmitz, Anderson, Maddox, et al, never did.