Congressman Steny Hoyer, the second-ranking Democrat in the U.S. House, says his party is worried that it will not have any candidates on the ballot in some California U.S. House districts, even in some states that the party could win in, because of the California top-two system. See this story.
How many top Donkey math MORONS hyped top 2 to get it enacted ???
—
NO primaries.
PR and AppV
Also the TYRANT stuff about the candidates that the *Party* want — [ie the top TYRANT HACKS want]
— tyrant threats on other candidates.
Just like the EVIL BAAAAD olde days before the 1888-1890 *official* primaries — by the gangster party bosses / tyrants.
I wonder what his blue dog colleague from WA-06 Derek Kilmer a product of top-two and an enthusiast of the same would say about that analysis. Their obsessive blue dogging is what’ll cost them.
They should also worry about being defeated by Kenneth Mejia in CA-34. His Green Party campaign has much more momentum and support than Republican campaigns do there.
But aside from that, it looks like the CA Dems are having buyer’s remorse about Top Two.
The United Coalition’s 23-year effort to build a team under pure proportional representation (PPR) continues to drive forward.
This, despite the bullies, censorers and slanderers, who only know how to cry loudly and spend vast amounts of time and money on skirmishes like the battle against top two.
Our team had a solid foundation on PPR and we have carried the ball for unity, 50/50 gender balance, and worthy unifying efforts to use the dry,
mathematical material of PPR.
http://www.international-parliament.org/ucc.html
But to the dividers we are liars who must be disrespected.
The United Coalition’s is trying to convince us men to unconditionally support female candidates, by alternating genders when they vote under top two to guarantee gender balance, but we haven’t been able to pin one of the males down for the support of candidates of our opposite gender on California elections.
The United Coalition’s first campaign was a team of four in 1992 for Santa Cruz City Council election where an the online presence was launched and maintained and now in 2018 the California team consists of more than 100 candidates for elective office.
In 1994 Ralph Nader [Independent] agreed to remain on the United Coalition’s paper ballot, one of 125 names for US President (POTUS), before he was a candidate for POTUS with California Green Party.
In 1997 Google derived their name from the United Coalition’s conversation in Usenet but they don’t want you to know, so they bought Dejanews, named it Google Groups, and then they deleted the evidence in Google Groups.
http://usparliament.org/how-google-got-its-name.php
In 2012, despite the vicious treatment by pluralists, the censorship from the national Libertarian Party’s (LP) web site, the United Coalition won the only LP State primary which fell before the LP national convention with 52.7%.
But the LP bosses made sure their delegates never knew about the victory and the winners were denied equal treatment and equal time.
Political party bosses do not support unity and collaboration, they oppose pure proportional representation (PPR), and they will do anything to wreck havoc on anyone with a new idea for smoother teamwork.
The party bosses oppose intra-party collaboration.
The United Coalition has been using pure proportional representation for more than twenty-three consecutive years and PPR works fine for intra-party collaboration.
http://www.international-parliament.org/ucc.html