Maine holds its primaries on June 12. The state is using ranked choice voting, and also voters will vote on a referendum on whether to keep ranked choice voting. Here is a New York Times story about the campaign for an against the referendum.
Maine holds its primaries on June 12. The state is using ranked choice voting, and also voters will vote on a referendum on whether to keep ranked choice voting. Here is a New York Times story about the campaign for an against the referendum.
Condorcet = Number Votes correctly done — with AppV YES/NO tiebreaker.
The story shows the ballot form — at least some education in Number Voting.
The general math problem —
DIVIDED MAJORITY —
50 DIVIDED [2 OR MORE PARTS] VERSUS 49 UNITED.
AKA 3 [OR MORE] CHOICES PROBLEM.
SOLVED BY CONDORCET IN 1780S (REPEAT 1780S) — A MERE 220 PLUS YEARS AGO.
———
MODIFIED CONDORCET —
EXPANDED MATH —
N CHOICES.
VOTE FOR N-1 USING NUMBER VOTES, MOVE LOWEST LOSER VOTES TO LEFT.
REPEAT UNTIL GET WINNER(S) — 1 OR MORE.
LEGIS BODIES — WINNERS TO HAVE A VOTING POWER EQUAL TO FINAL VOTES EACH GETS.
—-
CAN ADD *ABSOLUTE* YES/NO VOTES ON CHOICES SINCE NUMBER VOTES ***ONLY*** ARE *RELATIVE*
The one party system in SF, Oakland and Maine must be stopped.
FairVote, CoFOE, BAN and others are implementing the one party system and the SF Chronicle and Google don’t want you to know that the United Coalition opposes their initiatives to establish a one party system in more and more voting districts.
We in the deep South are a melting pot and we oppose the one party system caused by ranked choice voting in single-winner districts where the biggest civic group will 100% of the time, guaranteed.
The United Coalition has been using pure proportional representation (PPR) in multiple winner districts of two or more correctly for more than twenty-three consecutive years and PPR works fine.
http://www.international-parliament.org/ucc.html