On October 26, the Illinois State Board of Elections filed this reply brief in Gill v Scholz, c.d., 3:16cv-3221. This is the case that challenges the Illinois 5% petition for independent candidates for U.S. House. All the briefs are now in.
Although the state relies on precedent, the state doesn’t mention the teaching of the U.S. Supreme Court in Storer v Brown, and Mandel v Bradley, that courts could consider how often a law is used, and if it is used very seldom, it is probably unconstitutional.
One more MORON case – due to MORON lawyers for the plaintiffs.
1. Separate is NOT equal — Brown v Bd of Ed 1954
B-A-S-I-C 14 Amdt stuff. 58 years of JUNK over-ruled in Brown..
2. Each election is NEW.
3. EQUAL ballot access tests for ALL INDIVIDUAL candidates for the SAME office in the SAME election area.
WILL HEAVEN SAVE THE USA FROM MORON LAWYERS AND WORSE MORON JUDGES ??? —
OR LET THE USA SELF-DESTRUCT — AS WITH MANY ROTTED FORMER REGIMES FULL OF MORONS.
FOR THE CLUELESS —
ALL OF THE JUNK MORON BALLOT ACCESS CASES STARTING WITH WILLIAMS V RHODES 1968 MUST BE OVER-RULED —
VIA 1+2+3 ABOVE. Mere 50 years since Williams.