Spain held a parliamentary election on November 10, 2019. See this wikipedia article. Fifteen parties won seats under the proportional representation system, although a few of those parties are themselves coalitions. Thanks to Thomas Jones for the link.
Spain does not use limited voting in multiple winner districts on an at-large national election district and the disinformation campaign by BAN continues.
We are making headway because the L.P. is using ranked choice voting but in single-winner election districts brought by former chair Ted Brown and that guaranteed a one-party system.
Approximately 25% of the Los Angeles County L.P. convention used numerals correctly on the paper ballots and next year is a new year when we might approach 33.33%.
Us men have a plan, bring women voters up to 33.33% (plus one vote) and bring RCV voters up to 33.33% (plus one vote) and win Prez/VP with 66.66% (plus two votes).
If you want to be part of the action, simply print out a paper ballot, mark, sign and mail. Follow the instructions:
http://www.allpartysystem.com/e-aps-13.pdf
With 348 at-large seats, and the Spainish threshold of 3% votes to qualify which can only elect 33 seats, whose votes elect the remaining 315 seats under their so-called proportional representation system?
10 of the 16 parties that received seats are regionally based and favor more autonomy/sovereignity/independence for their region.
Richard, I thought you had banned Ogle and his spam. His first comment has absolutely nothing to do with the topic. Didn’t you also say you delete multiple postings in a thread from him?
RATIO PR—
Pre-election – candidate lists rank each other.
Total Votes / Total Members = EQUAL votes to elect each member.
Surplus votes down.
Lowest loser votes up – NOOOO threshold stuff.
=== ALL votes Count.
—
AppV — exec/jidic
TOTSOP
—
Spain still suffering from 1931-1976 chaos, Civil War and Franco regime.
Example 100 Votes, Elect 5
Ratio = 100/5 = 20
—
Surplus Moved
C1 25-20=5 Surplus
C2 19+1=20
C3 14+4=18
—
Final
C1 20=20 Elected
C2 20=20 Elected
C3 18+2=20 Elected
C4 17+3=20 Elected
C5 15+5=20 Elected
Sum 90+10=100
Losers 10 are moved to elected persons.
—-
Both majority rule [DEMOCRACY] and minority representation.
Simple enough for 5 of 9 SCOTUS HACKS to understand ???
—-
11-11 Remember the WW I dead/injured —
due to the EVIL KILLERS/enslavers of the monarch/oligarch Central Powers.
1919 FAILURE to set up PR and nonpartisan exec/judic and TOTSOP in ALL regimes.
Result – WW II many more dead/injured —
due to the EVIL KILLERS/enslavers of the monarch/oligarch Axis Powers.
1945 FAILURE to set up PR and nonpartisan exec/judic and TOTSOP in ALL regimes.
Result – WW III and OUT – for the human species ??? Stay tuned.
Too many New Age ZERO IQ political MORONS to count ???
@DR,
How did you decide which 5 ballots to transfer from C1 to C2 and C3?
From C1 PRE-election rank order list of other candidates.
@DR,
Isn’t that subject to the manipulation seen in the Australian Senate, or effectively working like D’Hondt?
All candidates must have their own rank order lists —
ASSume party hacks will rank each other ahead of other party folks —
BUT parties may split about internal stuff.
ranked choice voting has more going for it then any pr campaign in America.