U.S. District Court Grants Relief to Initiative Proponents in Arkansas

On May 25, U.S. District Court Judge Paul K. Holmes issued an opinion in Miller v Thurston, w.d., 5:20cv-5070, a case over petitions for initiatives in Arkansas. The opinion suspends the law that requires all initiative petitions to include a signature of the petitioner who asked voters to sign the petition. In other words, the signer becomes his or her own circulator. This enables the group that is sponsoring the initiative to electronically distribute the petition to voters willing to sign it. They can print the petition blank from their own home printer. The order also suspends the law that says the petition sheets must be notarized.

The opinion is 25 pages. It upholds the July 3 deadline for the petition to be submitted. The lawsuit had been filed by a group that supports an initiative for a nonpartisan redistricting commission. The order applies to all initiatives, not just that initiative.


Comments

U.S. District Court Grants Relief to Initiative Proponents in Arkansas — 1 Comment

  1. More UNCON judic legislation.

    When will SCOTUS 5 bring down a HAMMER on ALL exec/judic legislation ???

    — to avoid total destruction of legis bodies.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.