Briefs are due on September 8 in Daien v Ysursa, the case in U.S. District Court that challenges Idaho’s ban on out-of-state circulators for independent presidential candidates. The plaintiff, Donald Daien, wants to be a volunteer petitioner in many states for candidates who believe in the same ideas that Ralph Nader supports. Daien was a volunteer petitioner for Nader in the past in several states.
Weren’t out-of-state petition circulator bans thrown out in the Federal Circuit Court district which includes Idaho?
Yes. Idaho is in the 9th circuit.
Then wasn’t this already thrown out in court? Why does it have to go to court again?