Hawaii Supreme Court Upholds State’s Primary System

On December 23, the Hawaii Supreme Court upheld the state’s primary voting system. Malish v Nago, SCEC-22-682.

The Hawaii Constitution says in primary elections, no voter is asked to declare a party or declare independent status. It says each primary voter receives the primary ballots of all qualified parties, and if there are any independent candidates, also the primary ballot that only lists independents. The primary voter chooses one type of ballot and casts it.

The plaintiffs argued that the very act of the voter choosing one type of primary ballot is intrinsically forcing that voter to declare party memberhip, but the Court does not discuss this idea and merely says the plaintiffs have not stated a claim for which relief can be granted.


Comments

Hawaii Supreme Court Upholds State’s Primary System — 16 Comments

  1. Censor by being forced to choose a ballot for candidates to the exclusion of all other candidates for all other offices in the election. Some judicial decisions cannot be excused by ignorance when bias is more plausible. I refrain from using the f word to characterize those judges.

  2. Here’s what Google found:

    Why is Hawaii spelled with an apostrophe?
    Although “Hawaii” is the anglicized spelling used throughout the rest of the United States of America, Hawai’i, spelled with an okina between the Is, is the spelling used by most local Hawaiian people. An apostrophe is commonly used in the place of an okina, due to the lack of the symbol on most keyboards.

    However, although the island is spelled Hawai’i, it would take an Act of Congress to change the name of the State, since it was admitted in 1959 under the name Hawaii.

  3. You sound like an idiot. Every place in the world was invaded and conquered many times before 1914 and many places have been invaded and conquered since 1914. Right now legal and illegal aliens of mongrel races are in invading every White majority nation in the world as part of a plan by the globalist elite to replace and genocide Whites. That is just one of many examples.

  4. If so, he is right. There was nothing unique about the years 1492-1914 in this regard.

  5. LOTS OF EURO CONQUESTS IN 1492-1914 OF NON-EURO AREAS –

    THEN E-N-D OF MANY EMPIRES — WHEN/AFTER THEY ATTACKED EACH OTHER.

    USA- ONE MORE [GERRYMANDER] EMPIRE NOW COLLAPSING ??? —

    ESP DUE TO ANNUAL DEFICITS —

    USA/STATES/LOCALS BORROWING ABOUT 25-30 PCT OF ANNUAL SPENDING SINCE 1929 >>> 45 PLUS $$$$$ TRILLION DEBTS IN 2022

  6. So your only problem with conquest is when Europeans conquer non Europeans? That happened earlier too, for example the Roman empire. But I guess you have no problem with other people conquering Europeans like what’s happening now or what has happened before with Mongols, Huns, early Jihadis until stopped by Charles Martel, Ottomans, etc, etc? Or non-Europeans conquering other non-Europeans, or Europeans conquering other Europeans, like has always happened for as many thousands of years as written or archaeological records provide evidence for? Government debt and war are literally both as old or older than history.

  7. How would that be statism? What state or states were involved? As far as I know, none.

  8. KILL/LOOT –

    MODEL FOR MOST STATES AFTER ADAM AND EVE.

    NEW *STATE(S)* CREATED BY CAIN — *EAST OF EDEN* ???

  9. The ruling that is always handed down…but the Court does not discuss this idea and merely says the plaintiffs have not stated a claim for which relief can be granted.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.