Cha-Ching! The Team that Redrew Alabama’s Congressional Maps Wants $515,000 from the State for Their Services

Here is the story from al.com. I don’t know of a study that totals how much in legal fees government entities pay due to losing court decisions, but it has to be a substantial amount.


Comments

Cha-Ching! The Team that Redrew Alabama’s Congressional Maps Wants $515,000 from the State for Their Services — 12 Comments

  1. Inexcusable. The federal government should have had no business interfering in State election districts, especially with their anti-White agenda. If the South would have won we’d have had it made.

  2. There was nothing wrong with the Alabama districts the court unjustly threw out. Travesty of justice!

  3. None of this would have happened if they had multi-member districts with a single transferable vote.

  4. None of it would have happened if the federal government were to mind its own business.

  5. 1/2 X 1/2 = 1/4

    ROT SINCE 1200S IN OLDE ENGLAND >>> INTO COLONIES IN 1600S >>> INTO STATES IN 1776 >>> INTO USA REGIME IN 1789

    MATH BRAIN DEAD COURTS / MEDIA SINCE 1962-1964 ABOUT G MATH

    P-A-T

  6. I doubt electoral districts could have been very controversial in 1200s England. What public safety existed was generally provided by local government, so people would have been pretty clear on which local government (feudal lord) they held allegiance to. People didn’t move around much, so this allegiance was generally stable over multiple generations.

  7. ENGLAND / UK — ALL SORTS OF REBELLIONS / INSURRECTIONS

    GANGS OF MONARCHS/OLIGARCHS VS EACH OTHER— ESP UP TO 1487 —

    END OF WAR OF ROSES

    1530S – PURGE OF OLDE CATHOLIC CHURCH

    1642-1649 ENGLISH CIVIL WAR – KING CHARLES I BEHEADED

    1688-89 REVOLUTION — KING JAMES II FLEES ENGLAND — REBELLIONS TO 1745

    EXTREME MINORITY RULE IN HOUSE OF COMMONS TO 1832 GREAT REFORM ACT.

    NOW ABOUT 35 PCT MINORITY RULE IN UK WITH RURAL CONS AND URBAN LABOURS GERRYMANDER DISTS

    P-A-T

  8. Up until the Reform Act of 1832, the British House of Commons usually consisted 2 members from each county and 2 members from each chartered borough. The Reform Act abolished some of the “rotten” boroughs, which had become depopulated, and over-represented, and gave some more populous places more seats. But a general reform of the seats on a consistent distribution according to population didn’t happen until the Redistribution of Seats Act of 1885.

  9. ROTTED MINORITY RULE IN 1775 IN ENTIRE BRIT REGIME —

    MONARCH KING
    ELITE HEREDITARY HOUSE OF LORDS OLIGARCHY
    EXTREME MINORITY RULE HOUSE OF COMMONS -OLIGARCHY [MOSTLY REALLY CONTROLLED BY MONARCH AND LORDS OLIGARCHS]

    MAJOR FACTOR IN AM REV WAR

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.