Michigan Judge Declines to Kick Trump Off Michigan Ballot Due to 14th Amendment, Section 3 Claim — 20 Comments
To be overruled.
You read that wrong. It says declined.
So I did. Of course, that will stand.
Trump will win!
Long story made short: Any person, who meets the qualifications set forth in the US Constitution, may seek election to the office of President by naming Electors pledge to vote for them in any state. No state may refuse to count votes for those Electors of a candidate.
All disputes relating to eligibility of a candidate or pledged Electors to hold office and the validity of the election in any state is the solely within the jurisdiction of the Congress.
The US Constitution does not provide for any form of prior censorship of ballots to restrict voter freedom of choice, although all states have such laws known as ballot access laws which did not exist during the first 100 years under the Constitution and ought to be struck down by appropriate litigation.
Congress has the post election authority to deny office and has no pre-election authority to censor state ballots. To let this contradiction stand for over 100 years exemplifies the corruption of the political process by adherents of two corrupt political parties.
I refrain from using the f’ism word.
Trump will save America from left wing fauscism.
Frank Robinson, the case was about the primary. It has nothing to do with presidential electors.
Ballot access laws can be repealed by gradual implementation of the Max plan through getting rid of ballots and conducting elections by standing count of voters.
1. NOOOOO SUCH THING AS A ***POLITICAL*** QUESTION —
GOVT FOLKS DO OR DO NOT HAVE POWER TO DO OR NOT DO SUCH-AND-SUCH AT A TIME AND PLACE.
2.. 14-3 CRIMINAL CONVICTION VAI 1862 LAW NOT IN 18 USC 2383
TYRANT TRUMP — CITIZEN ARRESTS === OLDE COMMON LAW FOR CENTURIES
— BUT FALSE IMPRISONMENT [$$$ LOSS OF LIBERTY DAMAGES] IF NO PROBABLE CAUSE FOR ARREST
Fake news and more fake news.
Murray wrote:
“Frank Robinson, the case was about the primary. It has nothing to do with presidential electors.”
Even so, the 14th Amendment does not create any federal requirement to restrict any candidate from a primary ballot.
You phrase that oddly. It doesn’t create a requirement or prohibition on something that did not exist at the time, since there were no primary ballots. There’s no congressional authority to judge qualified candidates in primaries, but there is party authority at national conventions. The question is whether state governments can limit the choices of those national conventions. As far as I know that question has never been litigated, but maybe it has.
ALL 14-3 MACHINATIONS ARE MORE REASONS TO REPEAL THE 12 AMDT EC AND 14-3.
—-
P-A-T
You’re nuts. The electoral college has produced the only legitimately elected Presidents this century. Obama was not qualified due to being foreign born, and Biden only got in through a stolen election. If Algore or Killary had been president none of us would even be alive now.
To be overruled.
You read that wrong. It says declined.
So I did. Of course, that will stand.
Trump will win!
Long story made short: Any person, who meets the qualifications set forth in the US Constitution, may seek election to the office of President by naming Electors pledge to vote for them in any state. No state may refuse to count votes for those Electors of a candidate.
All disputes relating to eligibility of a candidate or pledged Electors to hold office and the validity of the election in any state is the solely within the jurisdiction of the Congress.
The US Constitution does not provide for any form of prior censorship of ballots to restrict voter freedom of choice, although all states have such laws known as ballot access laws which did not exist during the first 100 years under the Constitution and ought to be struck down by appropriate litigation.
Congress has the post election authority to deny office and has no pre-election authority to censor state ballots. To let this contradiction stand for over 100 years exemplifies the corruption of the political process by adherents of two corrupt political parties.
I refrain from using the f’ism word.
Trump will save America from left wing fauscism.
Frank Robinson, the case was about the primary. It has nothing to do with presidential electors.
Ballot access laws can be repealed by gradual implementation of the Max plan through getting rid of ballots and conducting elections by standing count of voters.
1. NOOOOO SUCH THING AS A ***POLITICAL*** QUESTION —
GOVT FOLKS DO OR DO NOT HAVE POWER TO DO OR NOT DO SUCH-AND-SUCH AT A TIME AND PLACE.
2.. 14-3 CRIMINAL CONVICTION VAI 1862 LAW NOT IN 18 USC 2383
3. WHEN IN SCOTUS ???
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2023/11/14/smurfs-sucker-punch-congress-avoid-shutdown-decorum/71584856007/
CONGRESS HACKS – NOW PHYSICAL ATTACKS ON EACH OTHER
SEE SAME IN 1854-1861 BEFORE CIVIL WAR I
TYPOS
2.. 14-3 CRIMINAL CONVICTION VIA 1862 LAW — NOW IN 18 USC 2383
USSR today is fake news.
https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2023/11/14/michigan-judge-allows-donald-trump-to-stay-on-presidential-primary-ballot-insurrection-riot-jan6/71577904007/
VARIOUS APPEALS BY THE USUAL SUSPECTS
https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2023/11/14/judge-says-neither-courts-nor-benson-can-keep-trump-off-michigan-ballot/71583494007/
DFP VERSION
https://news.yahoo.com/actual-incitement-legal-experts-alarmed-174314050.html
TYRANT TRUMP — CITIZEN ARRESTS === OLDE COMMON LAW FOR CENTURIES
— BUT FALSE IMPRISONMENT [$$$ LOSS OF LIBERTY DAMAGES] IF NO PROBABLE CAUSE FOR ARREST
Fake news and more fake news.
Murray wrote:
“Frank Robinson, the case was about the primary. It has nothing to do with presidential electors.”
Even so, the 14th Amendment does not create any federal requirement to restrict any candidate from a primary ballot.
You phrase that oddly. It doesn’t create a requirement or prohibition on something that did not exist at the time, since there were no primary ballots. There’s no congressional authority to judge qualified candidates in primaries, but there is party authority at national conventions. The question is whether state governments can limit the choices of those national conventions. As far as I know that question has never been litigated, but maybe it has.
ALL 14-3 MACHINATIONS ARE MORE REASONS TO REPEAL THE 12 AMDT EC AND 14-3.
—-
P-A-T
You’re nuts. The electoral college has produced the only legitimately elected Presidents this century. Obama was not qualified due to being foreign born, and Biden only got in through a stolen election. If Algore or Killary had been president none of us would even be alive now.