Landmark Legal Foundation Files Amicus Curiae Brief in U.S. Supreme Court in Trump v Anderson

On January 11, the Landmark Legal Foundation filed this amicus curiae brief in the U.S. Supreme Court, in Trump v Anderson, the Colorado ballot access case.  The brief’s lead argument is that if Donald Trump engaged in insurrection, then so did many other particular Democratic  office-holders.


Comments

Landmark Legal Foundation Files Amicus Curiae Brief in U.S. Supreme Court in Trump v Anderson — 14 Comments

  1. “History, case law, and congressional
    action all demonstrate that Section
    Three is not self-executing.”

    Exactly.

  2. “Three times in the last 100 days, pro-Palestinian
    protestors have been involved in illegal activity that
    could be labeled insurrection under Petitioners’ theory.”

    Good point.

  3. 1331 CIVIL


    18 USC 3231 – CRIMINAL

    The district courts of the United States shall have original jurisdiction, exclusive of the courts of the States, of all offenses against the laws of the United States.

    Nothing in this title shall be held to take away or impair the jurisdiction of the courts of the several States under the laws thereof.

    (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 826.)
    —-
    14-3 BRAIN ROT IN TOO MANY HACK BRAINS TO COUNT

  4. Talk about a false equivalence! There’s something of a difference between a small minority of protesters getting out of hand in otherwise peaceful dissent against Democratic/Republican political policies, and most of a protest devolving into breaking into the capitol with the intent to stop an electoral transfer of power.

  5. There have been pro-Palestinian protestors who intended to overthrow the US government? I must have missed that.

  6. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proclamation_of_Rebellion

    KG III — 23 AUG 1775 PROC OF REBELLION — AFTER 19 APR 1775 BATTLES OF LEXINGTON/CONCORD IN E. MASS

    … LONG 6.5 YEARS OF WAR TO 19 OCT 1781 USA-FRANCE VICTORY AT YORKTOWN, VA >>>

    1783 USA-BRIT PEACE TREATY — 13 ORIGINAL INDEPENDENT NATION-STATES IN *UNITED* STATES OF AMERICA

    VARIOUS STATE BILLS OF ATTAINERS ON CERTAIN TOP BRITS. ALL SORTS OF LOYALTY / ALLEGIANCE OATHS IN NEW STATES.

    SENILE/SUPER NUTCASE KG III TO 1820 – AFTER USA – BRIT WAR OF 1812-1815 – 1815 PEACE TREATY

    HOW MANY AMERICANS FOUGHT IN BOTH WARS ???

  7. Joshua H, you are entirely incorrect. 96% of the J6 protesters were peaceful and legal. Only about 4% trespassed.

  8. Even the 4% of J6 protesters who got carried away didn’t intend to overthrow the US government.

    Ostensibly, they wanted congress and the VP to dispute questionable results from a few states in presidential balloting, although most of them were following a herd and hadn’t thought it through.

    As a plan to overthrow the US government, it would have been laughable. There was no such plan.

    By contrast, during the burn l00t murder riots, “anti”fascist anarchists set up so called autonomous zones supposedly free from US and lower level governments.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.