On February 20, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to allow the U.S. Justice Foundation to file its amicus curiae brief in Trump v Anderson, 23-719, the Colorado Trump ballot access case. The U.S. Justice Foundation wanted to argue that the matter is a political question, not appropriate for a lawsuit. The amicus was filed beyond the deadline, but the Justice Foundation had asked the Court to waive the deadline. Here is the amicus, which now will not be considered.
ps://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2024/02/20/judge-allows-lawsuit-to-oust-kristina-karamo-to-go-forward-pete-hoekstra-trump-michigan-gop-rnc/72669472007/
Judge allows lawsuit seeking to oust Kristina Karamo as Michigan GOP chair to go forward
—
TO SCOTUS LATER ???
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/02/20/supreme-court-sanctions-challenge-bidens-michigan-win/72599165007/
Supreme Court allows sanctions on lawyers who tried to overturn Michigan’s 2020 election
Maureen Groppe
USA TODAY
23-486 ) POWELL, SIDNEY, ET AL. V. WHITMER, GOV. OF MI, ET AL.
)
23-497 ) WOOD, L. LIN V. WHITMER, GOV. OF MI, ET AL.
——
WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court on Tuesday let stand sanctions against Sidney Powell and other lawyers for abusing the court system with frivolous challenges to President Joe Biden’s 2020 victory in Michigan.
—–
ANY ELECTION LAW CLASSES IN OLDE/NEW LAW SKOOOOLS ???
You snooze, you lose.
NOOOO SUCH THING AS A *POLITICAL QUESTION* IN THE MORON COURTS.
EACH ACT/OMISSION DOES / DOES NOT VIOLATE THE LAW.