Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Almost Certain to be Excluded from the June 27 Presidential Debate

This story says that Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., is almost certain to be excluded from the June 27 presidential debate.  The main problem is that he still lacks a 4th poll that shows him at 15%.  See this story.


Comments

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Almost Certain to be Excluded from the June 27 Presidential Debate — 34 Comments

  1. NONPARTISAN APPV FOR ALL EXECS/JUDICS

    NOOO PARTY HACK CAUCUSES / PRIMARIES / CONVENTIONS

    EQUAL NOM PETS/ FEES FOR BALLOT ACCESS

    5 BILLION FEE ??? — MINI REDUCE USA NATL DEBT ???

  2. ADDED Q FOR B AND T —

    HOW. LONG HAVE YOU BEEN A ZOMBIE ???

    DO YOU MAKE LOVE TO DRACULA AND WOLFMAN AND FRANKENSTEIN AT MIDNIGHT UNDER FULL MOONS–

    OR JUST EAT BABIES WITH THEM. — WHILE PLOTTING MORE UN-DECLARED WARS ???

  3. This is terrible news but not unexpected given the CNN producers promised to keep Kennedy out of the debates. Unfortunately, I do not believe there is a right to private action to enforce FEC rules given that it seems obvious CNN is discriminating against non-uniparty candidates in this debate.

  4. I am voting for Kennedy but I never got my hopes high regarding appearing in the debates. It is rigged as always . Such a shame , Americans lose out again.

  5. Yep rigged to keep him out. CNN says although Biden and Trump are not actually on any ballots at this time they claim they can assume they will be after the convention. However given that Kennedy has already submitted in 24 states totaling 310 electoral votes they say until the states actually certify they can make No assumptions. Clearly a double standard

  6. The first Clinton-Trump debate in 2016 was awful. I haven’t watched another one of these since.

    But I might learn something from the Free and Equal debate on July 12.

  7. ANY COLLECTION OF OLDE DEBATE TAPES — OF PREZ CANDIDATE HAKES ???

    NEW AGE LOW TECH SLEEP AIDS ???

    MEANS ZERO TO THE HACKS — DUE TO ALWAYS *NEW* CONDITIONS IF THEY WIN

  8. That’s one problem. The other is the unlikelihood of states containing 270 electors to certify his ballot access petitions by CNN’s deadline – tomorrow?

  9. Of course, they already promised the Beijing Biden campaign Kennedy would be excluded at the outset. Given that they are better known as CCPNN or XiNN, this is the least surprising development imaginable. The criteria, and their interpretation, were made to be insurmountable.

  10. That’s one problem. The other is the unlikelihood of states containing 270 electors to certify his ballot access petitions by CNN’s deadline – tomorrow?

    Of course, they already promised the Beijing Biden campaign Kennedy would be excluded at the outset. Given that they are better known as CCPNN or XiNN, this is the least surprising development imaginable. The criteria, and their interpretation, were made to be insurmountable.

  11. A debate with only Biden and Trump is not going to change many people’s minds. Both are well known quantities by now. People need a chance to see Kennedy in the debates to make a fair comparison of him. Some more reasonable criteria should have been created to determine his eligibility.

  12. A debate with only Biden and Trump focuses everyone on the real choices, because nobody else is going to win. And it will change minds because some people aren’t sure yet, whether they’ll vote, how they’ll vote, or whether or how hard they’ll work to get other people to vote. There are people who have bought into the Republican propaganda that President Biden is incapable of debating, and the debate will show that he is firmly in control, especially when he does a completely unaided 180 standing backflip at the conclusion!

  13. “A debate with only Biden and Trump focuses everyone on the real choices, because nobody else is going to win”

    While probably true, that is a presumption, and not necessarily a presumption upon which debate eligibility ought to be determined.

  14. In fact, I suspect that if a debate is held with only Trump and Biden, a lot of folks will say: “I’d like to see more of Kennedy to make up my mind.”

  15. Comrade Ziobro, we do not agree, but even if we agreed, your previous point was that a debate with only President Biden and convicted felon and wannabe dictator Trump would not change many minds. Eligibility is a separate question.

  16. However, I also think your suspicion is, like, totally erroneous. If the brain worm guy was allowed to muck it up, which will never happen, I know a lot of people will say “I wish that raspy frog wasn’t taking all that time away from the real debate.”

  17. I’m celebrating Juneteenth because its the day the traitor spies Rosenberg’s were executed. Hurray!

  18. I’m celebrating the freeing of African-American slaves in Texas.

  19. REMEMBER THE UNION DEAD / INJURED — ABOUT 400K / 300 K

    THE REAL COST TO GET THE LAST SLAVES LIBERATED IN TEXAS.


    WILL THE 2 FOSSILS BOTH HAVE FATAL STROKES/HEART ATTACKS AS THEY SCREAM AT EACH OTHER ???

    HOW MANY DRUGS / O2 TANKS / ETC WITHIN 20 FEET OF THE HORROR SHOW SO-CALLED *DEBATE*. ???

  20. Wtf is “juneteenth”? I’m celebrating the last Soviet troops being expelled from Hungary and commemorating Imre Nagy and his fellow martyrs.

  21. Juneteenth is yet another occasion for Whites to bow and scrape to negroes and beg them to forgive us for bringing them here from Africa, where, as everyone can see, they are far better off today than they are in America. Haiti is, of course, an exception, because the slaves there freed themselves and killed their White oppressors.

    Juneteenth is also an occasion for negroes to congratulate themselves and each other and celebrate Black Culture, which teaches things like that they were kings in Africa. Naturally, there were plenty of kings in Africa, and some were possibly even conquered and sold into slavery to Whites, but common sense dictates that the vast majority of slaves taken from Africa were not kings, among the many false teachings of revisionist history peddled in concert with such DEI / CRT “Holidays” in which it is the Negro that is sanctified.

  22. DNC posted:

    However, I also think your suspicion is, like, totally erroneous. If the brain worm guy was allowed to muck it up, which will never happen, I know a lot of people will say “I wish that raspy frog wasn’t taking all that time away from the real debate.”

    Well, yeah. That’s a perfectly good reason to let Kennedy in the debate. People have a need to know how much functioning grey matter he has.

  23. SLAVERY ENDED BY 13 TH AMDT – PASSED SENATE IN 1864 — PASSED H REPS LATE JAN 1865 — DECLARED RATIFIED IN DEC 1865

    NOT JUNETEENTH 1865 IN TEXAS.

    NOT SURE IF ANY COURT CRIMINAL CASES ENFORCING JULY 1862 REBELLION / SLAVES ARE FREE ACT >>> 1862- 1863 EMANC PROCS

  24. Walter: annoying people and taking time away from the real debate is a good reason to include someone who won’t be President in the debate? Like, why?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.