A Georgia Administrative Law judge will soon decide whether Jill Stein should be on the Georgia ballot or not. Georgia law, passed just this year, says a “political body which has obtained ballot access in no fewer than 20 states or territories for the office of presidential elector” is automatically on the Georgia ballot for president only.
In Georgia, minor parties that are not ballot-qualified are still expected to file a list of their officers and bylaws, and then they are a “political body”, but except for the law mentioned above, they must petition for their nominees.
The original Georgia Green Party has the status of a political body. It is called the Georgia Green Party. But it is no longer affiliated with the national Green Party, because the national Green Party objects to the Georgia Green Party’s stance on gender care for teen-agers. The Georgia Green Party wants to outlaw such care.
Greens in Georgia who support such care have formed the Unified Green Party.
Georgia Democrats say Jill Stein can’t be on the ballot under the new law because the political body, the Georgia Green Party, is not the same organization that put Jill Stein on the ballot in other states around the nation.
The political body on 20 state ballots is the Green Party US, which has qualified. The Unified Green Party is the agent of the GP-US within GA. The law dose not seem to say anything against such a common arrangement. The GA-GP is not relevant as they are not recognized by the ballot qualified GP-US. I don’t see a problem.
Hopefully the Georgia Administrative Law judge espouses democracy.
The UGPGA was founded to “guarantee all inclusion of everyone” by means of excluding “anti-trans GAGP members”.
Diversity – just so long as it’s only superficial.
Equity for everyone – except of course those who don’t agree with us about everything all the time.
Inclusion – by means of excluding other opinions.
The Green Party is a joke – always has been, it’s the “green” party after all – but the UGPGA is a special kind of stupid. They should have just called themselves the Lavender Party or the Rainbow Party or something, because they clearly care more about opposing the “Women’s Declaration” than they do about their faux “environmentalism”. And given that the national party sided with the UGPGA, perhaps they should consider changing their name to that as well.
An other issue is the District of Columbia is not a State of these United States.
Did the UGPGA file a list of it’s officers and bylaws by the filing deadline may decide this issue but also will the SCOTUS decision in the Colorado situation with Trump also apply here which could invalidate the Ga requirement when applied to the Presidential election? Are there any lawyers on board who could speculate on that?
dc is besides the point when it’s 28 states and counting and soon to be in the 30s