Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Sues North Carolina State Board of Elections to Remove Himself from Ballot

On August 30, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., filed a lawsuit to remove himself from the North Carolina ballot. His party in North Carolina made the request with his consent. There is no deadline in the law for him to remove himself, and Kennedy argues that there is no basis in law to refuse his reqauest. See this story.

The case is filed in state court. Kennedy v North Carolina State Board of Elections, Wake County Superior Court.


Comments

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Sues North Carolina State Board of Elections to Remove Himself from Ballot — 20 Comments

  1. This is a funny. This website dedicated to BALLOT ACCESS and seems more news devoted on how to get off the ballot. lol

  2. I recall once upon a time in San Francisco all ballot were printed as American Independent Party ballots in error.

    I asked the ROV to reprint the ballots correctly. The ROV stated no. I am having a hard time to believe they will let ballot in this case be reprinted just because Bobby wants out.

    I like Bobby as a person very much but I do not see this will work because Bobby want off the ballot in NC to help my friend Donald Trump in November, 2024.

  3. You have candidates for electors in NC.

    Where do these candidates for electors stand on the issue of withdrawal?

  4. Getting off the ballot news is still ballot access news. Being drafted as a candidate or deceptively presented to voters as one can be just as much of an issue as having one’s candidacy censored or concealed via a vis others.

    None of which would be an issue with the standing count, where the physical presence of one candidate or supporter or party member at a voting location = voting access.

  5. Lots of litigation before elections could be prevented by not printing any candidate names or party labels on the ballot. If a voter wants to vote for a candidate let them write-in the name. If that person wants votes for them counted, then they can ask election officials to count ballots using their legal name only. The least we can expect of voters is that they know the name of their real most preferred candidate. “Helping” the voter by printing names is an excuse for censorship and candidate and party suppression. The official “helpers” are duopoly bureaucrats with a conflict of interest.

  6. Trump isn’t wrong about Harris. The problem is that he is hardly any better.

    Recent example: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/donald-trump-says-ivf-coverage-will-be-mandated/

    —————

    Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) isn’t far-right by any stretch of the imagination. They are populist and anti-immigration, but that’s about it.

    They are no further right than the Christlich Demokratische Union (CDU) was thirty years ago. Or the Freie Demokratische Partei (FDP) and Christlich-Soziale Union Bayern (CSU) fifteen years ago.

    This is merely propaganda by the same socialist establishment mouthpieces who move the Overton window ever further leftward. Just like we saw during the French election, when they labeled the leftist Rassemblement National as “far-right”.

  7. JR-

    SEE 2010 USA SENATE IN AK LAND – WRITE-IN —

    ABOUT 200 M PERSON VARIATIONS ???

    NOT SURE HOW MANY WITHOUT FIRST NAME

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.