On September 13, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court said it is upholding the decision of the Commonwealth Court that petitioning presidential candidates need a full slate of presidential elector candidates. This means that Claude De la Cruz, Randall Terry, and Cornel West, all of whom had enough valid signatures, still can’t be on the ballot.
Pennsylvania has no law saying a full slate is required, and as recently as 1988 there were presidential candidates on the ballot who did not have a full slate of elector candidates.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court as not yet explained its reasoning.
https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2024/09/13/vatican-pope-us-election/75209508007/
POPE –
LESSER EVIL
—
DO NOT VOTE FOR A-N-Y EVIL — ESP COMMIE HARRIS / FASCIST TRUMP
https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/nation/2024/09/13/pennsylvania-mail-in-ballots-with-flawed-dates-on-envelopes-can-be-thrown-out-court-rules/75211696007/
Pennsylvania mail-in ballots with flawed dates on envelopes can be thrown out, court rules
Mark Scolforo
Associated Press
Harrisburg, Pa. – Pennsylvania voters could have their mail-in ballots thrown out if they do not write accurate dates on envelopes they use to return them under a state Supreme Court ruling issued Friday that could impact the presidential race.
—–
ABS BALLOTS — DATES
COMBINED WITH SNAIL MAIL >>> FEWER LEGAL BALLOTS — TO GET COUNTED IN PA ???
https://electionlawblog.org/?p=145701
PA ABS DATES
HAS LINKS TO OPS
COMMIE DONKEYS GOING WILD ???
https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/13/politics/state-department-diplomatic-security-officer-pleads-guilty-to-storming-capitol/index.html
HOW MANY LEGIS/EXEC/JUDIC FOLKS IN THE 6 JAN 2021 USA REGIME [AND STATE/DC REGIMES] INVADED THE CAPITOL BLDG ???
ANY FOLKS IN THE RUSSIA / RED CHINA/ NK / ETC REGIMES ALSO INVADED ???
P 12 AMDT ELECTORS CASE-
ONE MORE REASON TO ABOLISH THE WORSE INSANE EC AND ALL ITS MACHINATIONS / LOOPHOLES / ROT
This is the same State Supreme Court that allowed them to count 2020 ballots after the deadline even if they had no postage date.
That blatantly violated Pennsylvania law and was the clearest case of legislating from the bench that I’ve ever seen.
They are NOT going to explain their reasoning, at least not sufficiently, because they are trying to rig the election again.
That is INSANE. I guess the duopoly was more sane back in 1988 because they at least respected democracy (more) back then.
Does Pennsylvania actually provide 19 write-in spaces for presidential electors? This is in statute, but maybe they don’t follow the law in Pennsylvania.
If so, then voters can vote for individual electors, and each elector might have a different number of votes. It is an overvote if you vote for a presidential candidate AND write-in some electors. But there should not be any problem writing in the name of 18 Democrat electors and not voting for Harris/Walz.
The statute with regard to presidential popular votes says that all electors affiliated with a presidential candidate are deemed to receive the same number of votes. If De La Cruz only had 13 elector candidates, then those 13 would receive that many votes.
The Top 19 elector candidates are elected. There is no requirement that they receive the same number of votes or support the presidential candidate. It might be tactically unwise for De La Cruz, but that does not make it illegal.