Wisconsin Supreme Court Decision in Kennedy Withdrawal Case Did Not Decide Constitutional Issue

As already reported, on September 27, the Wisconsin Supreme Court refused to let Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. withdraw from the ballot. Kennedy v Wisconsin Election Commission, 2024 WI37. Here is the 7-page opinion.

Significantly, it did not decide whether it is unconstitutional to give independent candidates less opportunity to withdraw, compared to party nominees. See page five. That matter has not been decided.


Comments

Wisconsin Supreme Court Decision in Kennedy Withdrawal Case Did Not Decide Constitutional Issue — 10 Comments

  1. EQUAL IN 14-1 AMDT — GET ON/OFF BALLOTS

    BRAIN DEAD LAWYERS/JUDGES RE E-Q-U-A-L SINCE 1868

  2. JD Vance is getting caned and buggered in the VP debate right now.

  3. “caned and buggered”, you say?

    “Debate: J.D. Vance Defeats Tim Walz, Norah O’Donnell and Margaret Brennan

    America wanted the answers to two crucial questions:

    – Is there any politician in America less qualified for high public office than Kamala Harris?

    and

    – Is it possible for debate moderators to be worse than ABC’s David Muir and Linsey Davis?

    The answer to both questions is a surprising “yes.” Tim Walz is less qualified than Kamala, and Norah O’Donnell and Margaret Brennan were the worst debate moderators in the history of debate moderators.

    It was another three-way gang-up, with the three Democrats (Walz, O’Donnell and Brennan) taking turns hurling accusations at Vance. Every question was either a Democratic Party talking point or, in some cases, a set-up to give Walz a chance to explain away his own various scandals. Like, they asked Walz about changing his gun-control stance, and he does his yada, yada, yada (obviously a rehearsed response) and then — without giving Vance a chance to reply — they moved on to housing.

    Then, after Walz gets to do his spin on housing, they go to Vance and then back to Walz, so he can “respond to an allegation” that Vance made about Harris’s immigration policy. This is one example of a pattern that repeated itself throughout the “debate.” Any criticism Vance made of the Biden-Harris administration was labeled by the moderators as an “allegation” to which Walz was then invited to respond.

    Give credit to J.D. Vance. He was focused and unflappable, maintaining his poise and stating his points clearly and confidently.”

    https://x.com/townhallcom/status/1841289927591399843

    https://x.com/CurtisHouck/status/1841292576340472302

    Ah, so exactly the same tactics as the ABC presidential debate. And exactly the same results: Vance didn’t do well, but Walz did terribly, and the moderators somehow did even worse.

    Either they are impossibly out of touch, or they are for some reason trying to hand Trump and Vance the election on a gold platter, and no longer mind destroying their own channels in the process.

  4. Over all, I thought he gave a surprisingly good performance but yeah, that one question really forked him in the Chess playing sense of the word. His deal with the devil we know will not let him speak the plain truth that Trump attacked America over an election he lost.

  5. Vance got beat like a blue headed tick on the ass of a red headed stepchild.

  6. Just because I had sex with your mother it doesn’t make me your daddy (Robert K Stock). Sorry, kid.

  7. Yes, caned and buggered. Analysts on tv and print media and viewer survey results all agree with me, not with nonsense poster.

  8. Your sources are Reich wing trash, which might explain at least some of your severe detachment from reality.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.