Comments

New York Times has Graphic Display of Presidential Candidates’ Ballot Access — 24 Comments

  1. Maybe someone here can copy the graphic to a website that isn’t subscriber restricted?

  2. I didn’t expect them to include Ohio for Dr. Stein, interesting.

    But lol at them including Dr. West but not people who have access to more certified electors than him, such as Terry (barely) and Claudia

  3. The New York Times ought to have included Claudia De la Cruz and Randall Terry, because they each are on the ballot in front of more voters than Cornel West is.

  4. West is on in more states than Terry. Wouldn’t have seen that coming a few months ago. Did the promised television ads ever get broadcast on actual tv? Details please

  5. De la Cruz exclusion is obvious discrimination against Latinos. A class action lawsuit is called for with the conversion of the NY Slimed into a Spanish language paper run by explicit rather than implicit socialists as one potential avenue of settlement.

    In the future , Tiempos de Reconquista, as it will henceforth be named, will never again ignore PSL presidential nominees or party announcements.

  6. FEC 2022 REPORT LATE-LATE-LATE

    FEC 2024 REPORT BY 2050 — DUE TO ZILLION ON/OFF PREZ/VP CANDS AND COURT CASES AND FOOTNOTES ???

  7. It’s damning that Randall Allan Terry hasn’t registered as a write-in candidate in a single state. Hard to take his candidacy seriously based on that alone. Even the alternative Constitution Party candidate Joel Skousen registered as a write-in somewhere (in Arizona).

  8. His candidacy allegedly had ulterior motives which actually had a reasonable rationale but signs of that plan manifesting in real life aren’t visible to me either . Has anyone seen them?

  9. Ny slimed research going into articles may occur before publication date, explaining such things as why they include Kennedy . Alternatively, the grand wizards of the newspaper of broken record (all the bullshit they find fit to print) decided who the relatively relevant Minor candidates were months ago and simply haven’t paid a wink of attention to any others.

    They are after all in their own minds still the grand arbiters of what is and isn’t fit, a delusion that is no longer as easy to maintain in the present millennium, but the additional decades of practice of ignoring the existence of a reality out side that self created information bubble have strengthened its walls even as their opacity has precipitously declined

    Or something

  10. Randall Terry didn’t even bother to file as a write-in in states, like West Virginia, where that process is virtually no cost (except for the notarized candidate statement, postage and envelope). Sad. Just plain sad.

  11. What’s Terry’s real reason for quasi running? It can’t be the ads since as far as I can tell those are still only online on their site

  12. I think it’s an insult to voters that Randall Terry appeared in a Free & Equal presidential debate and then made no effort to register as a write-in in at least some states. Anybody who was convinced to vote for him won’t have his or her vote counted in around 3/5th of the states.

    The Prohibition Party is another curious case: on the ballot in only one state, not a registered write-in anywhere so far. Word from IPR has it the Prohibition Party of New York failed to register as a write-in option “due to an inability to complete the required paperwork in time” but that they will try harder in future years.

  13. “Terry’s campaign currently has more than 100 ads now running in Florida where pro-abortion Amendment 4 is on the ballot. ‘Every single city in Florida is getting ads on The View, Stephen Colbert, Jimmy Fallon, and every Fox affiliate is getting ads for the morning news shows.'”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.