1. ONE MORE FAILURE TO REVIEW USA SENATE DEBATE ON 14-1 AMDT FIRST SENTENCE.

   ZERO DEBATE IN H REPS
   ———

   RESIDENTS – USA — FATHER — ALLEGIANCE TO USA CONST
   RESIDENTS – LEGAL FORN — FATHER — NOOO ALLEGIANCE TO USA CONST
   NON-RESIDENTS – ALL FORN

2. FATHER FORN FOLKS IN USA –

   ALLOWED IN AS TOURISTS / STUDENTS / SHIP WRECKED

   THEIR KIDS PHYSICALLY BORN IN USA ARE N-O-T USA CITIZENS
   —-
   EXTREME CASE – RICHEST PRIVATE FORN FATHER IN THE WORLD AND HIS HIGHLY PREGNANT WIFE LEGALLY VISIT THE USA AS TOURISTS OR SEEKING EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE FOR THE WIFE.

   SHE HAS KID ONE SECOND AFTER ENTERING USA AT AN AIRPORT OR ONE SECOND BEFORE PLANE TAKES OFF LEAVING THE USA AT AN AIRPORT.

   KID IS A CITIZEN OF FATHER’S NATION-STATE– NOT A USA CITIZEN.

3. THE ALLEGIANCE CHAIN GOES BAAACK TO THE MANY WARS OF OLDE ENGLAND WITH FRANCE IN THE OLD DARK AGE.

   DECADES OF WAR

   ENGLISH NOBILITY/WARRIORS HAD WIVES COME FROM ENGLAND TO FRANCE

   SOME HAD KIDS BORN IN FRANCE

   ENGLISH LAW PASSED STATING THAT SUCH KIDS BORN IN FRANCE WERE ENGLISH SUBJECTS.
   —
   COURTS BRAIN DEAD IGNORANT ON BASIC LAW OF NATIONS STUFF.

   1870 UK LAW RE SUBJECTS / NATURALIZATION REPEALED EARLY LAWS ON SUCH ITEMS.

4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalization_Act_1870

   UK LAW

5. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_British_nationality_law#Early_English_and_British_nationality_law

   History of British nationality law
   —-
   1350 ACT *******. DURING ONE HUNDRED YEARS WAR WITH FRANCE

6. IN DARK AGE –

   FOREIGN FOLKS COULD NOT OWN REAL ESTATE IN ENGLAND – ESP OLDE CASTLES / FORTS —

   ONLY SUBJECTS HAVING ALLEGIANCE TO BRIT MONARCH COULD.
   —
   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hundred_Years%27_War

   BAAAADE OLDE DAYS –
   WITH BRITS LOSING >>>

   WAR OF ROSES IN OLDE ENGLAND >>>
   HENRY 7 VICTORY >>> LESS DARK AGE IN ENGLAND

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.