Liberal Party Appears to Poll Enough Votes for Certain Privileges in Pennsylvania

The Liberal Party, a split-off from the Libertarian Party, was the only minor party on the statewide Pennsylvania ballot. It ran Daniel Wassmer for Superior Court Judge. He polled over 50,000 votes, almost double what was needed to gain a few privileges in future Pennsylvania elections. It will be on the voter registration form, and in special elections it will be on the ballot with no petition needed. The Libertarian Party also has this status, and will retain it, even though it had no nominees on the 2025 statewide ballot.


Comments

Liberal Party Appears to Poll Enough Votes for Certain Privileges in Pennsylvania — 18 Comments

  1. @Steve… If you call everyone a communist, then no one is…. and then suddenly we actually do end up with actual communists. Ever heard of “boy who cried wolf”? That’s what you and your kind are causing.

    The Liberal Party is Classical Liberal with a willingness to compromise with Neo-Liberals. Compromise… that’s how adults actually behave.

  2. “Aiden” is wrong. They are communists. Look at Waldenberger. He wants the government to run Uber.

  3. Aiden has a good point about the Pennsylvania Liberal Party. The word “liberal” has been stolen by statists and state-or-mind socialists.

  4. Not everyone is a commie, but woke leftards are, and that’s what these tools are. Virtually guaranteed 99% of their voters couldn’t tell what a classical liberal is. Most of them probably couldn’t tell you the difference between classical liberals and classic coke, and that’s being generous.

    Classical liberals were not woke. That’s an entirely modern “liberal” leftist heresy they share with Marxist and cryptomarxist termites who are still in the process of undermining their host nations’ social order through cultural bolshevism, as opposed to the culturally rigid policies they adopt once in power.

  5. She definitely needs to get her vision checked. Maybe she hurt her eyes the last time she came out to play, possibly with a stick or some kind of wood?

  6. Plenty of those views look communist, such as no prison for theft.

    “Aiden” (Robert K Stock) supports this view too.

  7. It is not known that Satanists are liars. It is alleged due to a scripture in the Bible. But that is just one more of many places where the Bible is wrong.

  8. Fred: I gather new information and weigh it against what I have believed in the past. If the new information shows that I was wrong, then I change my belief accordingly. What do you do when new information proves what you believe is wrong? Do you stubbornly hold to a belief that you know is wrong? I believe in the Scientific Method. Among Marxists that is known as Dialectical Materialism.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.