↓

Home Menu ↓
Skip to primary content
Skip to secondary content
  • Home
  • Print Issues
  • Useful Information
    • Links of Interest
    • Extra Features
    • Additional articles/essays
    • Essays by Richard Winger
  • Subscribe To Ballot Access News
Home→Author admin - Page 1920 << 1 2 … 1,918 1,919 1,920 1,921 1,922 … 1,968 1,969 >>

Author Archives: admin

Post navigation

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Chief Justice was a Foe of Minor Parties

Posted on September 3, 2005 by adminSeptember 3, 2005
Reply

Chief Justice William Rehnquist, who died September 3, was almost always a foe of minor parties and independent candidates. He voted against them on ballot access, and on debates, and on fusion. He wrote the decision in Timmons v Twin … Continue reading →

Posted in General | Leave a reply

Ohio Recount Case Moves Ahead

Posted on September 2, 2005 by adminSeptember 2, 2005
Reply

On September 1, a U.S. District Court in Ohio said a trial will be held in August 2006 in the Cobb-Badnarik recount lawsuit. The case, Rios v Blackwell, 3:04-cv-7724, northern district, was filed last year. It charges that even though … Continue reading →

Posted in General | Leave a reply

Ohio Court Hearing on Sep. 8

Posted on September 1, 2005 by adminSeptember 1, 2005
Reply

On September 8, the Ohio State Court of Appeals will hear a case on whether initiative circulators must be Ohio residents. State ex rel Finan v Blackwell, 05-APD-08-0854, Columbus. The decision will be out soon afterwards. The decision will determine … Continue reading →

Posted in General | Leave a reply

Write-in Reform Passes California Assembly

Posted on September 1, 2005 by adminSeptember 1, 2005
Reply

On August 31, the California Assembly passed SB 1050, which legalizes some write-ins when the voter forgot to “x” the box next to the name written in. The bill was amended in the Assembly, so now it must go back … Continue reading →

Posted in General | Leave a reply

New Mexico Presidential Recount Hearing

Posted on August 29, 2005 by adminAugust 29, 2005
1

The New Mexico Supreme Court is hearing Cobb & Badnarik v New Mexico Canvassing Board (#29095) on August 29, 2005. The issue is whether the two 2004 presidential candidates needed to submit a deposit of $114,000, or $1,140,000, in order … Continue reading →

Posted in General | 1 Reply

Post navigation

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Syndication:

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Contact Info & Privacy Info:

Richard Winger:
P.O. Box 470296,
San Francisco, CA 94147
richardwinger@yahoo.com
(415) 922-9779
Privacy Policy
The newsletter is published by and copyright by Richard Winger

Privacy Policy:

Privacy Policy

© 2026 - Proudly powered by WordPress  Weaver II by WP Weaver
↑