On May 24, the Arizona State Court of Appeals issued an opinion in Arizona Petition Partners v Thompson, 1 CA-SA 21-0170. It partially strikes down the state ban on paying initiative circulators on a per-signature basis. The court invalidated the severe criminal penalties placed on petitioning groups and petitioners alike. The decision also suggests that if the law doesn’t permit bonuses for high quality work, that part of the law is also unconstitutional. The record on that wasn’t clear, so that is not yet resolved. Thanks to Steve Kamp for this news.
On May 24, the Fourth Circuit issued an opinion in Cawthorn v Amalfi, 22-1251. This is the case filed by Congressman Madison Cawthorn against the North Carolina administrative procedure for evaluating the qualifications of congressional candidates. The U.S. District Court had ruled that the qualification at issue, the “insurrection” qualification mentioned in the Fourteenth Amendment, is no longer in effect because Congress in the 19th century gave everyone in the future amnesty.
None of the three judges on the Fourth Circuit panel agreed with the U.S. District Court. Judge Toby Heytens, a Biden appointee, wrote the opinion and said it is not necessary to decide whether states may judge qualifications for congressional candidates. He said it is enough that the panel decide the issue of whether the “insurrection” clause is still in effect. All three judges agree that it is still in effect.
The other two judges wrote concurrences which completely disagree with each other. Judge James Wynn, an Obama appointee, said states may judge qualifications for congressional candidates. Judge Julius Richardson, a Trump appointee, said states may not judge qualifications for congressional candidates.
Judge Wynn seems outraged that congressional candidates appear on the ballot in states in which they don’t live, but this practice has become quite common in recent years, and the Second and Fifth Circuits have allowed such candidacies.
All three judges agree that the U.S. District Court was wrong to rule that the challengers to Congressman Cawthorn could not intervene in the case. Their intervention was essential, because after Cawthorn won in the U.S. District Court, the state didn’t appeal. But the challengers did, which made this Fourth Circuit action possible.
This decision appears to be the first ballot access opinion written by a Biden appointee.
On May 12, the Missouri legislature passed HB 1878, an omnibus election law bill. Among other things, it abolishes presidential primaries. If Governor Mike Parson signs the bill, caucuses will be used instead. Thanks to Ken Bush for this news.
On May 24, 1819 News, a multi-media news source for Alabama, reported that the Secretary of State has accepted the validity of the Libertarian Party’s statewide petition. It required 51,588 valid signatures. The party has been working on it for almost two years. It is the largest election-administration petition ever completed in the state. Alabama has never had the initiative procedure, nor recall, nor referendum, for statewide measures. Also candidates get on primary ballots with filing fees, not petitions.
The 2022 election will be the first election in Alabama with a minor party since 2002, the last time the Libertarians were on statewide.
This is the most difficult petition drive completed by any minor party since 2018, when the Libertarians overcame Ohio’s requirement of 54,965. That Ohio drive gained the party ballot status for both 2018 and 2020. No minor parties are on the Ohio 2022 ballot.
On May 24, the New York League of Women Voters filed this reply reply in LWV of NY v Kosinski, s.d., 1:22cv-4084. This is the case concerning whether the statewide office primaries should be on June 28 or August 23.
Also on May 24, the judge denied the state’s request to have their attorneys appear by phone. The judge said this is a fact-intensive case and the oral argument will be much better if attorneys are physically in court for the arguments.