On December 23, the Maine Libertarian Party filed this brief in Baines v Bellows, 1:19cv-509. This is the ballot access case concerning new and minor parties. The Maine laws on de-enrolling party members when a party goes off the ballot, and restricting who can sign primary petitions, had been held unconstitutional on November 17, 2021. Afterwards the judge expected the Libertarian Party and the Secretary of State to come to a joint understanding on how to implement the decision.
But the Secretary of State declined to put the party back on the ballot, so now judge Lance Walker will decide.
It is normal for courts to put parties on the ballot, after the party has won a constitutional ballot access lawsuit. The U.S. Supreme Court put the American Independent Party on the Ohio ballot in 1968, and put the National Democratic Party on the ballot in several Alabama counties the same year (the National Democratic Party was an African-American party that was different from the Democratic Party). The U.S. Supreme Court also put the Harold Washington Party on the Cook County, Illinois ballot in 1990, even before declaring the laws that had kept it off the ballot unconstitutional.
Lower courts have taken similar action many times: in Alabama in 1990 (New Alliance), in Alaska in 1982 (Alaskan Independence), in Hawaii in 1974 (Peoples), in Idaho in 1984 (Populist), in Illinois in 1972 (Communist and Socialist Labor), in Kansas in 1982 (Libertarian), in Massachusetts in 1984 (New Alliance), in Michigan in 1984 (Socialist Workers), in Nebraska in 1976 and 1984 (Libertarian), in Nevada in 1986 (Libertarian) and 1992 (Populist and Natural Law), in New Mexico in 1988 (Workers World), in Ohio in 1970 (Socialist Labor), 2008 (Libertarian and Socialist) and 2014 (Libertarian, Green, Constitution, and Socialist), in Oklahoma in 1984 (Libertarian), in Tennessee in 2012 and 2014 (Green and Constitution), and in Wyoming in 1984 (Libertarian). There are probably other examples as well. In Maine itself, the Reform Party sued in 1996, but then the state agreed it had qualified for the ballot, so the court didn’t need to make a ruling.