U.S. Justice Department Files its Own Lawsuit Against Texas U.S. House and State House Districts

On December 6, the U.S. Department of Justice filed its own federal lawsuit against the new Texas U.S. House and State House district boundaries. There were already six or seven other lawsuits pending against the Texas redistricting plans. This one is U.S. v State of Texas, w.d., 3:21cv-299. Here is the Complaint.

Even if you don’t intend to read the Complaint, it is worthwhile to scroll through it to see some of the maps, especially the Dallas area U.S. House district maps on page 18.

The lawsuit charges Texas with violating section 2 of the federal voting rights act.

North Carolina State Appeals Court Postpones Candidate Filing for U.S. House and Legislature

On December 6, the North Carolina State Court of Appeals issues a two-page order. It says election boards should not allow primary candidates to file for U.S. House or state legislature at this time. Without this order, filing would have begun today at noon.

The lawsuit that brought about this order is North Carolina League of Conservation Voters v Hall, P21-525. It was filed earlier this year, and argues that the new U.S. House and legislative districts represent an unconstitutional racial gerrymander and also an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander. The case is based mostly on the state constitution. Thanks to Political Wire for this news.

Jill Stein Files “Statement of Issues” in U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C., Over 2016 Primary Season Matching Funds Repayment Order

On December 1, 2021, Jill Stein, Green Party presidential nominee in 2016, filed a Statement of Issues in the U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit. She is asking the Court to amend or reverse the Federal Election Commission decision earlier this year that she must repay $175,272 in 2016 primary season matching funds. See it here.

UPDATE: see this press release.

Read the Wording of the Missouri Top-Four Initiative

The text of the Missouri top-four initiative can be seen here, from the Secretary of State’s website. It is initiative 2022-051.

The initiative also deals with vote-counting equipment. Missouri requires initiatives to be single-subject.

An earlier version of the initiative provided that party labels should not be on ballots, but the latest version does permit party labels.

Nevada Top-Five Initiative Described in News Story

The Nevada Current has this story about the top-five initiative that will soon be circulating in Nevada.

Like other initiatives for top-two, top-four, and top-five, this one eliminates the easier method for a party to remain ballot-qualified. If the Nevada initiative became law, parties could no longer stay on the ballot by polling 1% of the statewide vote for any office. The vote test would shrink down to just president, and there would be no vote test at all in midterm years.

So far, all attempts to persuade top-anything proponents to address the problem have failed. One leader of the top-anything movement communicated via e-mail that it is “too late” to fix this problem in the group’s Missouri initiative.