Arkansas Files Brief in Minor Party Ballot Access Case

On October 14, Arkansas filed this brief in Libertarian Party of Arkansas v Thurston, e.d., 4:19cv-214. The brief says that no U.S. Supreme Court decision, and no U.S. Court of Appeals decision, has ever struck down a petition requirement that was 5% or less. This is almost laughably inaccurate. The U.S. Supreme Court struck down a petition requirement of approximately 42,000 signatures to run for Mayor of Chicago in 1979 in Illinois State Board of Elections v Socialist Workers Party. The U.S. Supreme Court also struck down a requirement of 50,000 signatures to run for Cook County Commission in 1992, in Norman v Reed.

The Eighth Circuit struck down North Dakota’s party petition of 15,000 signatures in 1980 in McLain v Meier. At the time, 15,000 was 3.3% of the numbr of eligible signers.

The Eleventh Circuit struck down Georgia’s 1% petition for president in 2016 in Green Party of Georgia v Kemp.

The Sixth Circuit struck down Michigan’s 30,000-signature requirement in 2021 in Graveline v Benson. That number was less than 1% of the last gubernatorial vote.

The state’s brief also says that the First Circuit upheld New Hampshire’s 3% petition in 2006 in Libertarian Party of N.H. v Gardner. Actually that case challenged the 3,000-signature requirement for the nominees of unqualified parties, and 3,000 was less than one-half of 1% of the last vote cast. New Hampshire has two methods for the nominees of unqualified parties to get on the ballot with the party label. There is a 3% full party petition but that was not the subject of that lawsuit.

The state’s brief also asserts that the 90-day limit on completing the petition is to prevent fraud, but the brief does not explain the connection between the short petitioning period and fraud. The state says that the fact that no one has ever complied with the Arkansas 3% petition means nothing because there is no evidence that anyone had tried and failed to collect the 3% petition. But from the past record of past lawsuits against past Arkansas 3% petitions, won by both the Reform Party in 1996 and the Green Party in 2006, it is obvious that parties in the past have tried and failed to complete a 3% petition.

California Group Will Again try to Qualify an Initiative to Permit Electronic Signatures

A group of Californians who support the initiative process are again trying to qualify an initiative that would legalize electronic signatures for initiatives. See their website at www.cirrra.com. Click here. The initiative was cleared to circulate on October 12, and its backers have six months to collect the needed signatures. They are hoping to find 5,000 individuals who will collect at least 200 signatures each.

They tried in 2019 but did not succeed.

U.S. District Court Refuses to Dismiss Virginia Redistricting Case

On October 12, U.S. District Court Judge David J. Novak refused to dismiss the lawsuit Goldman v Northam, e.d., 3:21cv-420. He also requested that the chief judge of the Fourth Circuit appoint two more judges for this case. The chief judge of the Fourth Circuit did make such appointments on October 13.

The issue is whether it violates one-person, one-vote, for Virginia to use districts based on the 2010 census to elect its House of Delegates on November 2, 2021. A hearing will be held in this case on December 3, 2021. It is possible that the election returns for House of Delegates held next month will be nullified, and a new election scheduled, after new districts, based on the 2020 census. Or it is possible that the 2021 election returns will be valid, but the winners will only be permitted to serve one year terms.

New York State Appeals U.S. District Court Decision That Struck Down Discriminatory Campaign Finance Law

On October 7, the state of New York filed a notice of appeal to the Second Circuit in Upstate Jobs Party v Kosinski, n.d., 6:18cv-459. This is the case over the law letting qualified parties donate more money to their nominees than unqualified parties are permitted to donate. The U.S. District Court had struck the law down on equal protection grounds.

Georgia Secretary of State’s Investigators Find No Evidence of Phony Absentee 2020 Ballots

On Tuesday, October 12, the Georgia Secretary of State presented evidence in state trial court that his investigators had examined all the Fulton County absentee ballots, and found none suspicious. There had been charges that some of them had never been creased, but the investigation found no such ballots. On Wednesday, the state court relied on that evidence to dismiss the case. See this story. Thanks to PoliticalWire for the link.