U.S. District Court Puts Maine Libertarian Party on the Ballot for 2022

On December 31, U.S. District Court Lance E. Walker issued an order in Baines v Bellows, 1:19cv-509. The order puts the Libertarian Party on the ballot for the 2022 election. It allows Libertarians who want to get on the June Libertarian primary ballot to collect nomination signatures from independent voters as well as Libertarian registrants.

Primary petitions require 2,000 signatures for Governor, so it still won’t be easy for Libertarians to get on the Libertarian primary ballot for Governor, because the only voters who can sign will be about one-third of the electorate. U.S. House candidates need 1,000 signatures. But it will be easy for Libertarians running for the legislature to get on the Libertarian primary ballot, because State Senate candidates need 100 signatures and State House candidates need 25.

Maine doesn’t have a U.S. Senate election in 2022, and doesn’t elect any statewide officers other than Governor.

The order does not apply to the Green Party, because the Green Party was not a plaintiff nor an intervenor in the lawsuit. It seems somewhat likely that the Secretary of State will extend this relief on primary petitions to the Green Party. If not, presumably the Green Party will sue.

The order also instructs election officials to contact all voters who were registered Libertarians in 2018, and who were converted to independents when the party went off the ballot. The postal letter will explain that the voter had been unlawfully converted from a Libertarian to an independent, and will ask that voter to return a postage-paid form if the voter wants to regain membership in the Libertarian Party.

The Secretary of State is not required to reprint any voter registration forms to list the party as a choice. But whenever the Secretary prints new cards, they must include the Libertarian Party. The Secretary of State’s on-line registration form will be immediately changed to list the Libertarians as a choice.

Oregon Supreme Court Rules that Inactive Voters Can’t Sign Petitions

On December 30, the Oregon Supreme Court issued a one-paragraph opinion, upholding a decision of the State Court of Appeals that signatures of persons on the inactive voter list are not valid. Whitehead v Fagan, S068382.

The decision relates to whether a statewide initiative, Petition 50, should be on the ballot. It had enough valid signatures if inactive voters counted, but now it won’t appear on the ballot. The subject of the initiative is for a carbon-free economy by the year 2050.

The decision seems irrational. The reason voters are transferred to the inactive list is that the post office has indicated the person has moved and has not re-registered at the new address. But when such a voter signs an initiative petition, that voter is giving fresh information about his or her current address. In many states, the new information about the address is then used to transfer that voter back to the active list, and to count the signature.

Georgia Governor Signs Redistricting Bills for U.S. House and Legislative Districts

On December 30, Georgia Governor Brian Kemp signed the bills to redistrict the state’s U.S. House and legislative districts. He waited until almost the last day to do that. A few minutes after he signed the bills, a federal lawsuit was filed challenging the new legislative district boundaries. Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity v Raffensperger, case number not assigned yet. Check back here tomorrow for a link to the Complaint, which alleges a racial gerrymander.

The petitioning period for independent candidates and the nominees of parties that didn’t poll 20% for President in the entire U.S., or Governor, opens in two weeks, but if there is uncertainty about the district boundaries, candidates can’t start to petition. The petition deadlines are in mid-July.

New Hampshire Bill to Convert Primaries from Semi-Closed to Closed

New Hampshire Representative David Love (R-Derry) has introduced HB 1166. It would convert primaries from semi-closed to closed. Currently an independent voter may choose a partisan primary ballot on primary day. The bill would restrict primary voters to those voters who had been a member of the party for at least the preceding four months.

If passed, the bill would be unconstitutional as applied to any party that wanted to let independents continue to choose its primary ballot. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Tashjian v Republican Party of Connecticut that parties are free to decide for themselves whether to let independents vote in their primaries.

UPDATE: here is the text of the bill. Thanks to Alvin See for the link.

Maine Libertarian Party Files Letter with U.S. District Court, Giving Examples of Courts that Put Parties on Ballot After Law Declared Unconstitutional

As previously noted, in November 2021, a U.S. District Court in Maine struck down two ballot access laws that bar minor parties from the ballot, in a case filed in 2019 by the Libertarian Party. But the judge has not yet ruled on injunctive relief.

On December 29, the party filed a letter with the court, mentioning precedents from other states that say when a ballot access law is declared unconstitutional in a lawsuit filed by a minor party, it is normal for the court to then put that party on the ballot. Here is the four-page letter, which includes three U.S. Supreme Court precedents, won by the American Independent Party in Ohio in 1968, the National Democratic Party in Alabama in 1968, and the Harold Washington Party in Illinois in 1990. The National Democratic Party of Alabama, despite its name, was a minor party not affiliated with the Democratic Party. The letter includes precedents from lower courts as well.