On June 10, the Forward Party asked the California Secretary of State to tally how many people register into it.  New parties in California generally get on the ballot by taking this step, and then persuading about 75,000 people to register into the party.

The Forward Party had not previously taken this step in California, because it considered itself aligned with the Common Sense Party, and the Common Sense Party was doing its own registration drive.  But the Common Sense Party registration drive stalled out before it had obtained even half of the needed registrations.

As already noted, on June 13 the U.S. Supreme Court issued an opinion in FDA v Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, cutting back on standing for associations that say they have standing because the government policy they are opposing causes them to spend more money.

The very next day, June 14, Tennessee filed a notice of supplemental authority in Ashe v Hargett, m.d., 3:23cv-1256.  This is the lawsuit filed by voting rights organizations against the Tennessee law that requires signs on primary day at the polls, warning voters they must not choose the primary ballot of a party they aren’t loyal to.  The notice of Supplemental Authority filed by the state argues that this case must be dismissed because the plaintiffs don’t have standing.

Even though No Labels is no longer running a presidential nominee, it is still in court in two cases that it had filed before it decided not to run a candidate.  In Arizona, the lawsuit over whether No Labels could block candidates for Congress and state office is pending in the Ninth Circuit.  The No Labels response is due July 22.

In Delaware, its trademark lawsuit will have a trial starting May 19, 2025.  It had sued a parody site called “No Labels.com.”