On June 3, U.S. District Court Judge Edmund A. Sargus denied relief to Ohio initiative proponents. Thompson v Governor of Ohio Michael DeWine, s.d., 2:20cv-2129. The case involved difficulty of completing initiative petitions (both statewide and local) during the health crisis. The judge said the case is not moot. He wrote, “The previous year illustrates the difficulty in predicting the high and low tides of a once-in-a-century pandemic. So long as a global pandemic is present, there is a ‘demonstrated possibility’ that Plaintiffs will be again subject to public health orders of the type they challenge in the Complaint.”
But, he said the Sixth Circuit has already ruled that the burden in 2020 for initiative proponents was only “intermediate” and that is not enough to declare the procedures, as applied in a pandemic, unconstitutional. Here is the opinion. Thanks to Mark Brown for the link.