April 2021 Ballot Access News Print Edition

Ballot Access News
April 2021 – Volume 36, Number 11

This issue was printed on white paper.


Table of Contents

  1. SIXTH CIRCUIT STRIKES DOWN MICHIGAN’S INDEPENDENT STATEWIDE PETITION LAW
  2. MONTANA MAY EASE NEW PARTY PETITION
  3. IOWA INCREASES BALLOT ACCESS BARRIERS
  4. SOUTH CAROLINA FEES ON MINOR PARTIES
  5. NEW GEORGIA LAW MAY HELP TO WIN BALLOT ACCESS LAWSUIT
  6. ARKANSAS TOUGHENS PRESIDENTIAL PETITION
  7. U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION ON MOOTNESS
  8. HIGH COURT WON’T HEAR DEBATES CASE
  9. WHICH THIRD PARTIES HAD THE MOST U.S. HOUSE CANDIDATES, 1912-2020
  10. 2022 PETITIONING FOR STATEWIDE OFFICE
  11. VOTER CHOICE: PRESIDENT COMPARED TO U.S. HOUSE
  12. SPECIAL ELECTIONS
  13. ELECTION RETURNS BOOK
  14. SOCIALIST WORKERS PARTY PETITIONS FOR NEW JERSEY GOVERNOR
  15. SUBSCRIBING TO BAN WITH PAYPAL

J. T. Young, Former Official Under President George W. Bush, Says if Jo Jorgensen Voters Had Voted for Trump, Trump Would Have Won

The Hill has this commentary by J. T. Young, a former executive branch officer under the George W. Bush presidency. Young says if the voters who voted for Jo Jorgensen had voted for Donald Trump in 2020, Trump would have been re-elected.

Of course, these analyses are not fully meaningful, because no one knows how voters who vote for third party candidates would have voted if that third party had not entered a nominee.

Texas Senate Passes Bill Reinforcing Existing Law for Filing Fees for Candidates Nominated by Convention

In Texas, smaller qualified parties nominate by convention; larger ones by primary. For over 100 years, the only Texas candidates who had to pay a filing fee were candidates running in a primary. On April 29, the Texas Senate unanimously passed SB 2093, which says no one can be considered for a convention nomination unless he or she has paid a filing fee to the government. It passed unanimously. Here is the text.

The 2019 legislature also passed a filing fee bill for convention nominations, but it was worded so badly that it was not enforced in 2020.

SB 2093 originally said the filing fee should be payable to the political party, but it was amended to direct the fee to the government.

The behavior of the Texas Senate stands in stark contrast to the South Carolina legislature. South Carolina has always had the same rules for filing fees that Texas has had. Only primary candidates pay filing fees. A bill to impose filing fees on South Carolina convention parties failed to pass in this year’s session of the South Carolina legislature.

The logic for requiring convention party candidates to pay filing fees is faulty. The U.S. Supreme Court has already ruled that filing fees are unconstitutional, unless they are needed for the compelling need to keep ballots from being too crowded. But convention parties don’t have ballots to be crowded. Thanks to Jim Riley for the news about the Texas bill.

Georgia Files Response in Ballot Access Case Over Proposed Relief for U.S. House Candidates

On April 30, Georgia filed this response in Cowen v Raffensperger, 1:17cv-4660. This is the case in which the Libertarian Party had challenged the number of signatures for U.S. House, for all candidates who are not the nominees of parties that polled 20% of the vote for president in the entire nation in the last election, or 20% for Governor of Georgia. On March 29 the U.S. District Court had struck down the 5% petition for U.S. House. The judge had then asked both sides for suggestions as to what the new requirements should be, until the legislature amends the law.

The plaintiffs had proposed 500 signatures, or payment of the filing fee, which is very high. In his April 30 response, the Secretary of State says that 500 is “astoundingly low” and “has never been tried.” This is not true. Before 1943, Georgia let independent candidates for U.S. House, and the nominees of unqualified parties, on the ballot with zero signatures and no filing fee, and the state never had a crowded ballot for U.S. House. In fact it never had a U.S. House election in the entire history of government-printed ballots with more than four candidates on the ballot. Georgia has only had government-printed ballots since 1922.

The statement is also false if it is meant to include other states. States that require 500 or fewer signatures for independent candidates for U.S. House are California (40), Florida (zero), Hawaii (25), Idaho (500), Kentucky (400), Louisiana (zero), Mississippi (200), Nevada (100), New Jersey (100), Oklahoma (zero), Rhode Island (500), Tennessee (25), Texas (500), Vermont (250) and Washington (zero).