Wyoming House Defeats Bill to Revise Order of Candidates on Ballot

On February 12, the Wyoming House defeated HB 160 by 17-43. It would have revised the law on the order of candidates on general election ballots. Currently the nominees of the party that won the last U.S. House election are automatically on the top line of the general election ballot. The bill would have changed that, so that any candidate would have an equal opportunity to appear first on the ballot. The bill’s sponsor is Representative Marshall Burt, the state’s only Libertarian legislator.

Here is a link to the legislature’s website that shows how each state house member voted. Click on “votes.” Then click on “H 3rd Reading Failed”.

Counterpunch Carries Another Article on Harm Done by HR One to Minor Parties

Counterpunch has a new article about the harm done to minor parties by HR One, the bill in Congress to change many election laws. This one is also by Howie Hawkins, the Green Party presidential nominee in 2020. The article is balanced and acknowledges the helpful parts of the bill. The article also has a list of reforms that should have been included in the bill. The Green Party is doing a very good job of publicizing the harmful aspect of the bill. No daily newspaper has even mentioned that the bill makes it much harder for presidential candidates to qualify for primary season matching funds. Thanks to Fairvote for the link.

Arkansas Supreme Court Defeats Secretary of State’s Attempt to Save One Restriction on Ballot Access for Initiatives

On March 11, the Arkansas Supreme Court agreed with a lower state court, and ruled that the lower court was correct last year when it enjoined a state law that makes it more difficult for initiatives to get on the ballot. Thurston v Safe Surgery Arkansas, cv-20-562. Here is the 25-page opinion.

The law says that before an initiative may begin to circulate, the sponsors must obtain from the Arkansas State Police a criminal record search for every paid circulator who is expected to work on the initiative. The lower court found a technical flaw in the law. The law says that the criminal search shall include both state and federal crimes. However, the State Police have no ability to obtain that information for federal crimes.

The Secretary of State argued that the lower state court should just have stricken reference to federal crimes, in order to solve the problem, but the State Supreme Court said the court had no power to do that. The Supreme Court notes that there is no severability clause in the law.