Sixth Circuit Expedites Libertarian Party Case on Composition of Ohio Election Commission

On June 18, the Sixth Circuit expedited Libertarian Party of Ohio v Wilhem (formerly known as Libertarian Party of Ohio v Taveras), 20-3585. This is the case in which the Libertarian Party challenges the law that excludes members of parties (other than the Democratic and Republican Parties) from ever being on the Ohio Election Commission. The U.S. District Court had upheld the law, which says the Commission shall consist of three Republicans, three Democrats, and an independent chosen by the other commissioners.

Ohio Greens File Brief in Ballot Access Case

On June 15, leaders of the Ohio Green Party, and two of the Green Party candidates for the presidential nomination of the party, filed this brief in the Ohio Green ballot access case, Hawkins v DeWine, s.d., 2:20cv-2781. The state is trying to have the case dismissed because the Sixth Circuit had denied ballot access relief for Ohio initiatives in Thompson v DeWine. The plaintiffs argue that Thompson v DeWine was wrongly decided, rather than distinguishing between initiative ballot access and minor party/independent candidate ballot access.

Thompson v DeWine is pending in the U.S. Supreme Court.

U.S. Supreme Court Asks Ohio to Respond in Lawsuit Over Ballot Access Relief for Initiatives

on June 17, the U.S. Supreme Court asked Ohio to respond to the appeal for ballot access relief in Thompson v Dewine, 19A-1054. This is the case over ballot access relief for Ohio initiatives. The U.S. District Court had granted relief, but then the Sixth Circuit had reversed that. The state’s response is due Monday, June 22.

Sixth Circuit Won’t Rehear Case that Denied Ballot Access Relief for Ohio Initiatives; Case is Now in U.S. Supreme Court

On June 16, the Sixth Circuit refused to rehear Thompson v Dewine, 20-3526. This is the case in which a U.S. District Court in Ohio had ordered ballot access relief for proponents of an Ohio initiative, but then the Sixth Circuit had reversed, and said because Ohio’s lock-down had included an exception for “First Amendment activities”, therefore the initiative proponents were free to be circulating, and the state could not be blamed for their difficulties caused by the health crisis.

The proponents had already asked the U.S. Supreme Court to overrule the Sixth Circuit, even before the Sixth Circuit had made a decision about rehearing. Now that the Sixth Circuit has refused to rethink the case, it is now docketed in the U.S. Supreme Court, 19A1054.

This is the first ballot access case related to the health crisis that has been presented to the U.S. Supreme Court.