Ninth Circuit Dismisses Lawsuit on Huge Population of California Legislative Districts

On May 6, the Ninth Circuit dismissed the lawsuit Citizens for Fair Representation v Newsom, 18-17458. This is the case filed in 2017 that argues the population of California legislative districts is so huge, ordinary residents of California have no realistic chance to communicate with their legislators. State Senate districts in California have over 1,000,000 residents; Assembly districts 500,000.

Here is the six-page opinion, which says none of the plaintiffs have standing. It will not be published. Thanks to Kevin Sabo for this news.

Independent Party Intervenes on the Side of the Connecticut Libertarian Party

The Independent Party, which is on the ballot for most state and federal offices in Connecticut, but not all offices, has been allowed to intervene on the side of the Libertarian Party of Connecticut, in the ballot access case. Libertarian Party of Connecticut v Merrill, 3:20cv-467.

On May 19, the Independent Party filed this brief in support of injunctive relief. Thanks to Tim Cotton for this news.

U.S. District Court Eases Some Requirements for Ohio Initiatives

On May 19, U.S. District Court Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr., a Clinton appointee, issued an order easing certain requirements for Ohio initiatives to get on the ballot. Thompson v Devine, s.d., 2:20cv-2129. The order extends the petition deadline from July 1 to July 31. It allows electronic signatures. And it dispenses with the need for a witness signature from the circulator of the petition sheet. The relief only extends to the initiatives being circulated by the groups that brought the lawsuit.

This is the first federal court decision easing ballot access requirements for initiatives in connection with the current health crisis.